Search for: "Institute For Justice v. IRS"
Results 201 - 220
of 265
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
16 Aug 2014, 12:15 pm
Sebelius and King v. [read post]
10 Jul 2014, 6:45 am
” (Burwell v. [read post]
9 Jul 2014, 1:15 pm
In theory, the IRS’ plan works. [read post]
5 Jun 2014, 7:30 am
The fruits of NSA surveillance routinely end up in the hands of the IRS. [read post]
7 May 2014, 5:55 pm
Mitch McConnell (R-KY), the Institute for Justice and the National Rifle Association, the case was re-argued. [read post]
11 Apr 2014, 5:57 am
The employer was therefore entitled to attorneys’ fees under the EAJA (Gate Guard Services v Perez, April 7, 2014, Rainey, J). [read post]
29 Mar 2014, 5:09 pm
Hilliard (1859) 10 Ir. [read post]
10 Mar 2014, 8:25 pm
Judge Mark Bennett entered a consent decree on February, 28, 2014, resolving the brought by the EEOC in EEOC v. [read post]
24 Feb 2014, 2:03 pm
This essay is adapted from his foreword to Eugene Volokh, Sebelius v. [read post]
12 Feb 2014, 7:31 am
” That’s how attorney Dan Alban, of the Institute for Justice, a libertarian public interest law firm, described the February 11 ruling by the U.S. [read post]
11 Feb 2014, 8:31 am
Congratulations to Dan Alban at the Institute for Justice, who won the case; IJ is one of the top libertarian law firms in the country, and I’ve long much admired its work. [read post]
15 Nov 2013, 3:03 pm
On September 25, 2013, the Dehkos, with the attorneys at the Institute for Justice (IJ), filed a constitutional lawsuit challenging the federal government’s use of civil forfeiture in their case. [read post]
17 Oct 2013, 1:08 am
Power [1985] IEHC 1; [1985] IR 648. [read post]
25 Sep 2013, 11:21 am
They are the lead plaintiffs in Loving and are represented by the Institute for Justice (Dan Alban is at the helm). [read post]
1 Aug 2013, 8:32 am
Ireland is not directly tackling the problem of the "Bournewood gap" and ECHR case-law such as H.L. v UK; Stanev v Bulgaria; D.D. v Lithuania and other cases. [read post]
15 Jul 2013, 9:05 pm
Mitch McConnell (R-KY), the Institute for Justice and the National Rifle Association, the case was re-argued. [read post]
27 Jun 2013, 9:01 pm
The General Perjury Statute (18 USC 1621) has been nicely encapsulated in United States v. [read post]
26 Jun 2013, 2:00 pm
As in Lawrence, Justice Kennedy wrote the majority opinion in United States v. [read post]
22 Jan 2013, 7:56 am
The Institute for Justice, Alban’s employer, thinks there’s a better alternative to increased government regulations: voluntary certifications. [read post]
19 Jan 2013, 7:24 pm
The Institute for Justice represented the preparers in this case. [read post]
