Search for: "Israel v. United States" Results 201 - 220 of 1,272
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
15 Sep 2014, 7:15 am
The names, variants and associated data may not reflect the views of the United States Government on the sovereignty over geographic features. [read post]
12 Apr 2016, 8:48 am by Jack Goldsmith
Marty Lederman says in response to my posts that the big difference between the Bush and Obama preemption doctrines was that the Bush Administration “argued that international law permits the United States to engage in a ‘first use’ strike, in a nonconsenting state, against a state or nonstate actor that has not already engaged in an armed attack against the United States, before any threat of attack is ‘fully… [read post]
28 Nov 2023, 4:58 am by Beatrice Yahia
Secretary of State Antony Blinken will visit Israel, the United Arab Emirates, and the West Bank this week, the U.S. [read post]
23 Mar 2017, 1:00 pm by Pnina Sharvit Baruch
By imposing almost utopian standards, which Israel naturally fails to meet, the Report manages to reach the outcome—the outcome that the COI, in practical political terms, was designed to reach—of condemning Israel, but at the price of setting a standard that is impracticable for any state seeking to successfully conduct major hostilities in the types of battlefield environment that confronted Israel in 2014. [read post]
13 May 2022, 6:44 am by Paul Stephan
Does this mean that the many states that labeled Israel an international outlaw could have ignored its rights under international law? [read post]
9 Jun 2021, 6:16 am by ernst
” In the United States, as elsewhere, the law has been used both to perpetrate and to combat antisemitism, historically and today. [read post]
27 Jun 2013, 8:58 am
Madison — as quoted in the DOMA case, United States v. [read post]
4 May 2012, 5:46 pm by INFORRM
The Upper Tribunal has handed down judgment in the case of Raed Mahajna v Secretary of State for the Home Department IA/21/21631/2011. [read post]
8 Mar 2012, 3:00 am by Ted Folkman
The United States would seem to have a very strong interest in protecting its citizens (the plaintiffs in the Linde case, one of several consolidated cases, are US citizens, citizens of Israel, or citizens of both the US and Israel) from terrorist attacks and in holding terrorist financiers to account. [read post]
11 Jan 2009, 9:02 am
 And neither Israel nor the United States has ratified AP I. [read post]
9 Mar 2018, 4:34 am by Edith Roberts
Tesla Energy Operations Inc., which asks when a state or local government can appeal the denial of a motion to dismiss based on state-action immunity. [read post]
8 Jun 2015, 10:32 am by Lyle Denniston
”  In making that plea, the government lawyers had relied upon a sweeping statement by the Court, in the 1936 decision in United States v. [read post]
21 Mar 2024, 5:02 am by Beatrice Yahia
The United States has submitted a draft resolution to the U.N. [read post]
22 Apr 2023, 1:48 pm by Eugene Volokh
The United States Supreme Court has cautioned that this rule does not relieve a pro se litigant of the obligation to follow a court's procedural rules …. [read post]
10 Nov 2011, 9:50 am
In 2002, as part of the Foreign Relations Authorization Act, Congress enacted Section 214, entitled “United States Policy with Respect to Jerusalem as the Cpaital of Israel. [read post]