Search for: "J. S. Morales" Results 201 - 220 of 3,380
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
28 Jun 2023, 6:21 am by Donrich Thaldar
By contrast, we might characterize bioethics experts as raising principled objections to heritable HGE as a technology, such as Jürgen Habermas’s articulation of the “right” of the prospective child to an “unaltered genome. [read post]
23 Jun 2023, 9:58 am by Eugene Volokh
From Wednesday's California Court of Appeal decision in Firefighters4Freedom v. [read post]
23 Jun 2023, 8:22 am
More significantly, the range of education broad enough--indeed as broad as the tolerated political spectrum--to ensure sometimes substantial conflict in the principles, morals, and objectives of the education proffered to and made available for consumption by the masses. [read post]
20 Jun 2023, 10:01 am by Eugene Volokh
In Bishop, this Court upheld a university's "demand[ing]" "the separation of [a professor's] personal views from his professorial duties. [read post]
20 Jun 2023, 8:58 am by Marcel Pemsel
Additionally, the Court observed that some of the absolute grounds in Art. 7(1) EUTMR, by their nature, relate to all goods and services of a trade mark.The CJEU mentioned in this regard trade marks contrary to public policy or accepted principles of morality (Art. 7(1)(f) EUTMR, deceptive marks (Art. 7(1)(g) EUTMR), and marks violating protected designations of origin and geographical indications, traditional terms for wine, traditional specialities guaranteed, and plant variety rights… [read post]
19 Jun 2023, 5:26 am by centerforartlaw
Additionally, the museum’s ability to repatriate cultural artifacts is constrained by the provisions of the British Museum Act of 1963 (infra). [read post]
18 Jun 2023, 6:00 am by Lawrence Solum
Arrow's theorem has spurred two lines of development in welfare economics. [read post]
16 Jun 2023, 11:46 am by Ted Max
”[16] Regarding the dilution by tarnishment claim asserted by Jack Daniels, the Supreme Court held that the Ninth Circuit erred by concluding that VIP’s use is noncommercial because it parodies and “convey[s] a humorous message” about Jack Daniels.[17] The Supreme Court noted that Section 1125(c)(3)(A)(ii)’s “fair use exclusion has its own exclusion: It does not apply when the use is ‘as a designation of source for the… [read post]
7 Jun 2023, 5:00 am by Guest Author
The Biden Administration’s proposed revisions to Circular A-4 keep much of the previous structure in place, but with updates and improvements. [read post]
4 Jun 2023, 6:30 am by Guest Blogger
This “subsidy” effectively leads to moral hazard. [read post]
28 May 2023, 3:59 am by SOQUIJ
Il soutient également que le juge a erré en lui imposant la peine à laquelle il avait déjà été condamné lors du premier procès. [read post]