Search for: "JANE DOE, B" Results 201 - 220 of 537
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
26 Dec 2017, 8:16 am by David Luban
The government also wants the Court to take disciplinary action against Jane Doe’s counsel. [read post]
25 Dec 2017, 9:39 pm by Marty Lederman
  In the Jane Doe case that was the subject of the October oral argument, the government insisted that this was the case even where, as there, abortion was illegal in the minor's county of origin (see p. 29).This "no undue burden because the minor can depart the U.S. [read post]
21 Dec 2017, 10:36 am by Marty Lederman
  DOJ represented to the court of appeals that they the agency had discovered that Jane Doe was 19 years old, not 17, which would mean that HHS no longer had the authority to hold her. [read post]
22 Nov 2017, 1:00 pm by Sarah Grant
District Court Judge Colleen Kollar-Kotelly’s order last month in Jane Doe 1, et al., v. [read post]
20 Nov 2017, 8:15 am by Neumann Law Group
A plaintiff, in his capacity as the personal representative of the estate of a victim, brought a Massachusetts nursing home negligence action against Park, Marion, and Vernon Streets Operating Company, LLC d/b/a Brookline Health Care Center (BHCC), and John Doe Physicians and Jane Doe Nurses. [read post]
20 Nov 2017, 8:15 am by Neumann Law Group
A plaintiff, in his capacity as the personal representative of the estate of a victim, brought a Massachusetts nursing home negligence action against Park, Marion, and Vernon Streets Operating Company, LLC d/b/a Brookline Health Care Center (BHCC), and John Doe Physicians and Jane Doe Nurses. [read post]
12 Nov 2017, 11:00 pm by Kevin LaCroix
Affiliated Ute Does Not Apply to Claims Based Primarily on Misstatements The Second Circuit agreed with defendants that the district court should not have given plaintiffs the benefit of the Affiliated Ute Adhering to two of its prior decisions, the court held that Affiliated Ute does not apply to claims based “primarily” on affirmative misstatements, as opposed to omissions.[6] The court noted that the alleged omissions were “simply the inverse” of the… [read post]
2 Nov 2017, 2:53 pm
It's how they tried to prevent Jane Doe from exercising her constitutionally protected reproductive freedom. [read post]
24 Oct 2017, 10:58 am by Colby Pastre
Key Findings Early analysis of the distribution of the corporate income tax relied on theoretical models and thought experiments. [read post]
27 Aug 2017, 4:00 pm by Embajador Microjuris al Día
Una vez la abogada Jane Doe se percató de la existencia del perfil, solicitó a la compañía que le proveyera la dirección IP de la computadora desde donde había originado el perfil. [read post]
25 Jul 2017, 9:26 am by jefferyscholar
 And in cases such as this – a lawsuit concerning the knowing transmission of an STD – we have protected our client’s privacy: she is listed as “Jane Doe” in all court documents. [read post]
24 Jul 2017, 10:24 am
(Supreme Court of Ohio Sides with Taxpayers in Two Recent Real Estate Taxation Decisions)By: Stephen D. [read post]