Search for: "JJS" Results 201 - 220 of 1,825
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
17 Jun 2022, 9:08 pm by Public Employment Law Press
., CENTRA, LINDLEY, AND CURRAN, JJ. 402 CA 21-01479 [*1]IN THE MATTER OF AMY NEWMAN, PETITIONER-APPELLANT, vCITY OF TONAWANDA, RICK DAVIS, AS MAYOR OF CITY OF TONAWANDA, AND CHARLES STUART, FIRE CHIEF OF CITY OF TONAWANDA, RESPONDENTS-RESPONDENTS. [read post]
17 Jun 2022, 9:08 pm by Public Employment Law Press
., CENTRA, LINDLEY, AND CURRAN, JJ. 402 CA 21-01479 [*1]IN THE MATTER OF AMY NEWMAN, PETITIONER-APPELLANT, vCITY OF TONAWANDA, RICK DAVIS, AS MAYOR OF CITY OF TONAWANDA, AND CHARLES STUART, FIRE CHIEF OF CITY OF TONAWANDA, RESPONDENTS-RESPONDENTS. [read post]
17 Jun 2022, 5:12 am by Sara E. Teller
AG Todd Rokita announces a settlement with Johnson & Johnson and opioid distributors. [read post]
13 Jun 2022, 6:03 am by Michael Geist
The episode features (in order of appearance): CRTC Chair Ian Scott, Canadian Heritage Minister Pablo Rodriguez, Morghan Fortier, Oorbee Roy, Justin Tomchuk, JJ McCullough, Jeanette Patel, Scott Benzie, Patrick Rogers, Matt Hatfield, Michael Geist, Rachael Thomas, John Lewis, Stephane Cardin, Monica Auer. [read post]
10 Jun 2022, 9:32 pm by Public Employment Law Press
., SMITH, PERADOTTO, AND WINSLOW, JJ. 516 CA 21-00840 [*1]IN THE MATTER OF DANA HENSLEY, ON BEHALF OF HER MINOR CHILDREN AND ALL OTHERS SIMILARLY SITUATED, ET AL., PETITIONERS-PLAINTIFFS-RESPONDENTS, vWILLIAMSVILLE CENTRAL SCHOOL DISTRICT, ET AL., RESPONDENTS-DEFENDANTS, ANDREW M. [read post]
10 Jun 2022, 9:32 pm by Public Employment Law Press
., SMITH, PERADOTTO, AND WINSLOW, JJ. 516 CA 21-00840 [*1]IN THE MATTER OF DANA HENSLEY, ON BEHALF OF HER MINOR CHILDREN AND ALL OTHERS SIMILARLY SITUATED, ET AL., PETITIONERS-PLAINTIFFS-RESPONDENTS, vWILLIAMSVILLE CENTRAL SCHOOL DISTRICT, ET AL., RESPONDENTS-DEFENDANTS, ANDREW M. [read post]
5 Jun 2022, 7:03 am by Mark Summerfield
  The majority (Middleton and Perram JJ) proposed an alternative two step test which asks firstly whether the claimed invention is ‘a computer-implemented invention’ and then – if so – ‘can the invention claimed broadly be described as an advance in computer technology’. [read post]