Search for: "JOHN DOE 6" Results 201 - 220 of 6,609
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
5 Jan 2024, 4:36 pm by Steven Calabresi
She is also a generation younger than Trump, and it is again time, as President John F. [read post]
5 Jan 2024, 12:30 pm by John Ross
Hokes Bluff, Ala. man enters the Capitol on Jan. 6 and leaves after about 13 minutes, having damaged no persons or property. [read post]
4 Jan 2024, 12:44 pm by John Elwood
The trial court ruled for ASEA, holding that the First Amendment “does not require the State to alter the union dues deduction practices in place prior to” the attorney general opinion. [read post]
3 Jan 2024, 4:00 am by jonathanturley
If the Court does not act before Jan. 4th, Colorado could seek to moot any appeal and avoid review. [read post]
2 Jan 2024, 9:06 am by jonathanturley
Chuck Schumer was widely criticized (including by Chief Justice John Roberts) when he went in front of the Supreme Court to publicly declare “I want to tell you, Gorsuch. [read post]
2 Jan 2024, 4:00 am by jonathanturley
She was one of the first officials to declare the Jan. 6 riot to be an “insurrection” prompted by Trump’s speech. [read post]
2 Jan 2024, 2:13 am by Robin E. Kobayashi
ADJ4406140 (LAO 0757168), ADJ3079851 (LAO 0757065), ADJ4664450 (LAO 0757166), ADJ3316783 (LAO 0757165), ADJ400663 (LAO 0757067)—WCAB Panel: Commissioner Snellings, Deputy Commissioners Garcia, Schmitz Workers’ Compensation Appeals Board (Board Panel Decision) Opinion Filed June 29, 2023 Attorney’s Fees—Depositions—Penalties and Interest—WCAB, granting reconsideration, rescinded decision in which WCJ found that applicant’s attorneys were barred by doctrine of… [read post]
1 Jan 2024, 6:00 am by DONALD SCARINCI
By a vote of 6-3, the justices held that the raced-based policies violated the Constitution’s Equal Protection Clause. [read post]
31 Dec 2023, 5:12 am by Just Security
How Much Prison Time Does Former President Trump Face? [read post]
29 Dec 2023, 1:06 am by David Pocklington
He considered that there were exceptional circumstances which justified the grant of a faculty [6]. [read post]
28 Dec 2023, 5:00 am by Neil H. Buchanan
  And with his column's warnings still ringing in my ears, I took special note of an op-ed published the next day (January 6) in The Washington Post titled: "Canadian intellectuals worry about the U.S. becoming a dictatorship. [read post]
23 Dec 2023, 7:16 pm by admin
”[6] One of the several disconnects between the plaintiffs’ expert witnesses’ animal studies and the human diseases claimed was the disparity of dose and duration between the relied upon studies and the service men claimants. [read post]
23 Dec 2023, 12:38 pm by Michael Lowe
  They are removed in their entirety for those who have 0 to 6 criminal history points. [read post]
22 Dec 2023, 6:00 am by Michelle
Raphael Warnock of Georgia and John Fetterman of Pennsylvania made the plea in a letter Monday to CFPB Director Rohit Chopra. [read post]
21 Dec 2023, 5:12 am by husovec
The reasoning behind the suspicions is not public (and unlikely to be disclosed pending the investigation) but the press release shows that the Commission suspects that X might be violating the following provisions: Article 16(5/6) [submission interfaces & handling of illegal content notices], Article 25(1) [potential misleading character of blue checkmarks], Article 39 [the failure to implement proper ad archives], Article 40(12) [failing to allow accessibility of public data for… [read post]
20 Dec 2023, 2:50 pm by Cynthia Marcotte Stamer
If you find this of interest, you also be interested in reviewing some of our other Solutions Law Press, Inc. resources available here such as: Employer’s Overzealous I-9 Documentation Demand Triggers Civil Monetary Penalty Brett Brenner Appointed EEOC Deputy Chief Operating Officer Texas Private Employer COVID-19 Vaccination Mandates Effective February 6, 2024 Pizza Operator Faces Prison Time For Failing To Pay Employment Taxes New HIPAA… [read post]
20 Dec 2023, 1:27 pm by Amy Howe
” Sauer also argued that the Supreme Court does not have the authority to consider the case at all because Smith prevailed in the lower court. [read post]