Search for: "JONES v. U.S. DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE" Results 201 - 220 of 487
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
18 Jun 2018, 4:00 am by Walter Dellinger
Far from being authoritative, it was essentially repudiated within months by the Justice Department in the United States’ filing in the Supreme Court in United States v. [read post]
17 Jun 2018, 4:16 pm by INFORRM
The Wagner family’s lawsuit against broadcaster Alan Jones concluded on Wednesday- coverage of the final day of submission can be found in the Guardian. [read post]
6 Jun 2018, 10:17 am by John Elwood
Court of Appeals for the 9th Circuit improperly departed from the Supreme Court’s decision in White v. [read post]
7 May 2018, 5:00 am by Shannon Togawa Mercer, Ashley Deeks
Technology companies are working with U.S. police departments to develop facial recognition technology for body cameras—but the United States isn’t alone in its exploration and development of facial recognition technology. [read post]
3 May 2018, 3:32 am by Scott Bomboy
One theory is that the attorneys could site a 1997 opinion by the U.S. [read post]
14 Mar 2018, 3:01 pm by Cameron Kerry
Interestingly, though, Nitze clerked for Justice Sotomayor during the 2012 Supreme Court term, when the court decided U.S. v. [read post]
14 Mar 2018, 4:05 am by Edith Roberts
Murphy, the Justice Department “worried that a Native American death penalty case at the U.S. [read post]
21 Feb 2018, 12:52 pm by William Ford
Attorney General Jeff Sessions declared Tuesday that he will create a Cyber-Digital Task Force at the Justice Department, the Washington Post reports. [read post]
24 Sep 2017, 7:38 am by Eric Goldman
Department of Justice (DOJ) could pursue a wider range of prosecutions against online services. [read post]
18 Sep 2017, 4:13 am by Steve Lubet
Before the end of the year, Ruffin would author the opinion inState v. [read post]
27 Jul 2017, 6:01 pm by sophia
Jones, in which five justices agreed that ongoing electronic surveillance by the government of an individual’s movements implicates that individual’s reasonable expectation of privacy. [read post]