Search for: "James C. Justice, II"
Results 201 - 220
of 386
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
23 Nov 2013, 3:08 pm
READ INTRODUCTION AND PART II (pp. 117-28; 152-72). [read post]
29 Jul 2007, 12:11 am
(My only hesitation here is that I can't figure out why that objection was not also included in the signing statement.)c.) [read post]
23 Nov 2014, 12:23 pm
II. [read post]
13 Feb 2023, 9:59 am
Part II. [read post]
16 Jun 2011, 5:38 am
II. [read post]
17 Apr 2019, 6:11 am
Sirica emphasized several times that Nixon’s lawyer, James St. [read post]
12 Jun 2009, 3:09 pm
II, § §2—3; Art. [read post]
22 Mar 2012, 7:44 pm
Donoghue (right) (International Court of Justice).? [read post]
8 Apr 2024, 11:45 am
II, § 2, cl. 1. [read post]
25 Jul 2018, 4:37 am
After we get done with Justice Kennedy, then we should proceed to interrogate every judge or Justice who ever sat on the Ninth Circuit during the time Kozinski was also serving as a judge. [read post]
10 Jun 2024, 4:00 am
” Jonathan Turley is the J.B. and Maurice C. [read post]
14 May 2012, 9:25 am
The author of this blog is Douglas C. [read post]
6 Oct 2013, 9:01 pm
Michael C. [read post]
8 Mar 2018, 10:38 am
Mattis—the case of the U.S. citizen captured fighting alongside ISIS in Syria and currently being held by U.S. military forces in Iraq—the Justice Department claimed that, even absent statutory authorization, President Trump has the constitutional authority under Article II to detain members of ISIS “as long as U.S. troops are engaged in active hostilities on th[e] battlefield. [read post]
11 Jun 2010, 8:36 am
§1325(b)(2)(A)(i) and (ii) (2006 ed.). [read post]
24 Apr 2018, 10:13 am
Sweeney, James D. [read post]
26 May 2023, 10:08 am
Greener, The Gun and Its Development 66-67 (9th ed. 1910); Charles C. [read post]
17 Nov 2011, 5:17 am
Admittedly the Justice case recently experienced a vogue of attention in the United States, particularly among lawyers looking for possible precedents for bringing charges against the authors of the “torture memos” in Bush’s Justice Department.[4] But even this brief renaissance of interest quickly waned as the precedential relevance of the Justice appeared smaller than hoped.[5] The fact that the NMT program has long been treated as nothing more than a… [read post]
26 May 2020, 10:29 am
What follows is an excerpt, which omits many of the specific details; you can see those details in the full decision (focus on Justice Scalia's concurrence and Part II of Justice O'Connor's dissent). [read post]
15 Sep 2013, 6:53 pm
For this post we consider the first part of section II of the materials: II.B. [read post]
