Search for: "James V. Martin v. State" Results 201 - 220 of 615
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
14 Jun 2017, 3:52 pm by Lovechilde
”  But claims of executive privilege can be overcome by a compelling government interest in disclosure and, as the Supreme Court held in U.S. v. [read post]
25 May 2017, 5:00 am by David Meyer Lindenberg
So you went to law school right as a generation of legal thinkers was persuading people, bit by bit, that both judicial activism and restraint were misguided, and that courts can and must enforce constitutional limits on the state. [read post]
23 May 2017, 12:40 pm by Jordan Brunner, Chris Mirasola
James Connell that no additional action was required on motion 245, regarding a potential revision in expert procedure. [read post]
9 Apr 2017, 8:35 am
Section V then posits an alternative analysis, normatively autonomous (though not entirely free) of the orbit of the state, a vision possible only when the ideological presumptions of the state are suspended. [read post]
3 Apr 2017, 3:14 pm by Jordan Brunner
During the course of an extended back-and-forth on proper administrative procedures, James G. [read post]
27 Mar 2017, 11:04 am by Emma Kohse
Chief Prosecutor Brigadier General Mark Martins and James Connell, counsel for Baluchi, both confirm that they are ready to proceed on the matter. [read post]
16 Mar 2017, 12:09 pm by Jordan Brunner
Elena Chachko discussed EU sanctions and international humanitarian law in her examination of the Court of Justice of the European Union case, A v. [read post]
3 Mar 2017, 9:30 am by Benjamin Wittes, Quinta Jurecic
” And finally, on January 20, 2017, in apparent accordance with Article II, Section I, Clause 8, “Before he enter[ed] on the execution of his office, he [took] the following oath or affirmation:—‘I do solemnly swear . . . that I will faithfully execute the office of President of the United States, and will to the best of my ability, preserve, protect and defend the Constitution of the United States. [read post]
16 Feb 2017, 12:21 pm by Jordan Brunner
DOJ has asked the 9th Circuit to hold its consideration of Washington v. [read post]