Search for: "John Doe Inc 1-2" Results 201 - 220 of 2,462
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
10 Sep 2017, 3:07 pm by Wolfgang Demino
LEVY, District Judge.Jane Forrester Winne and Transworld Systems, Inc. notified the Court on May 2, 2017, that they had reached a settlement agreement. [read post]
26 Dec 2013, 5:01 am
The Board had affirmed a Section 2(e)(1) mere descriptiveness refusal of INTELLIGENT QUARTZ for watches [QUARTZ disclaimed]. [read post]
30 Apr 2014, 8:41 pm
Category: Claim Construction    By: John Kirkpatrick, Contributor TitleUnited Video Properties, Inc. v. [read post]
4 Apr 2006, 1:22 am
In re Veeco Instruments, Inc., Serial No. 76383240 (March 22, 2006) [not citable].For some reason, the Board considered the Section 2(e)(1) issue first. [read post]
17 Dec 2020, 3:38 am
We therefore find that consumers will not perceive the commonly-used expression or phrase HELP THE PERSECUTED as distinguishing Applicant’s charitable fundraising services in commerce and indicating their source.And so the Board affirmed the refusal to register under Sections 1, 2, and 45 of the Trademark Act.Read comments and post your comment here.TTABlogger comment: Noted trademark expert David Perlsack says that he hasn't seen so many failure-to-functions in such a… [read post]
16 Dec 2016, 3:14 am
The USPTO refused registration of the mark RANGE FARMS under Section 2(e)(1), finding it to be merely descriptive of poultry. [read post]
7 Apr 2011, 3:15 am by John L. Welch
The Board again disagreed, observing that the evidence regarding incontinence briefs was itself sufficient, and that the other evidence has probative value as well.And so the Board affirmed the refusal.Text Copyright John L. [read post]
9 Mar 2021, 3:30 am
SolarWindow filed again in 2018 and was rejected again on both Section 2(e)(1) and res judicata grounds. [read post]
2 Jan 2014, 8:37 am by Jeff Kosseff
Doe, the appellate court held that “Michigan rules of civil procedure adequately protect Doe 1's constitutional interests. [read post]
24 Jul 2017, 3:21 am
And to the Board panel for digging into the details of this utility patentText Copyright John L. [read post]
7 Oct 2009, 10:27 pm
In this Section 2(d), 2(e)(1) and dilution-based opposition, Opposer Enbridge, Inc. moved for summary judgment on the ground of fraud, claiming that Applicant Excelerate had never used the applied-for mark ENERGY BRIDGE for various services recited in the subject use-based application. [read post]
8 Aug 2019, 7:08 pm by Lynn L. Bergeson and Carla N. Hutton
Session 1 Keynote: Vision for the Future of the Nanotechnology Enterprise: John Rogers, Northwestern University. [read post]