Search for: "John v. Duffy" Results 201 - 213 of 213
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
27 Jun 2008, 10:04 am
You can separately subscribe to the IP Thinktank Global week in Review at the Subscribe page: [duncanbucknell.com] Highlights this week included: Court reconsidering baseless ‘making available’ theory in file-sharing case Capitol Records v Jammie Thomas; amicus briefs from, MPAA, PFF: (Electronic Frontier Foundation), (Electronic Fontier Foundation), (Techdirt), (Ars Technica), (Patry Copyright Blog), (Patry Copyright Blog) ICANN approves rules allowing brands to be… [read post]
14 Nov 2008, 2:12 am
(Techdirt) Halliburton tries to patent form of patent trolling (Techdirt) (I/P Updates)(Law360) From 15 September, committing any crime can result in revocation of ‘privilege’ to prosecute before USPTO (Patent Prospector) USPTO to increase PCT transmittal and search fees (Peter Zura's 271 Patent Blog) (Law360) US Patents – Decisions Questions of fact re alleged enjoined imitations prevent contempt: Liquid Dynamics Corp v Vaughan (Chicago Intellectual… [read post]
26 Mar 2020, 3:54 pm by Michael Abramowicz
John Duffy and I argued that such "speculative patents" should be patentable only if they meaningfully accelerate the arrival of technologies. [read post]
12 Oct 2011, 4:59 am by Rob Robinson
http://bit.ly/nWotnF (Jeffrey Klein, Nicolas Pappas) ECPA Protects Non-Citizen Communications Stored in the US – Suzlon Energy v. [read post]
19 Oct 2011, 4:40 am by Rob Robinson
http://bit.ly/nWotnF (Jeffrey Klein, Nicolas Pappas) ECPA Protects Non-Citizen Communications Stored in the US – Suzlon Energy v. [read post]
19 Oct 2011, 4:40 am by Rob Robinson
http://bit.ly/nWotnF (Jeffrey Klein, Nicolas Pappas) ECPA Protects Non-Citizen Communications Stored in the US – Suzlon Energy v. [read post]
12 Sep 2012, 4:58 am by Rob Robinson
Ask A Man Who Can – http://bit.ly/NfTBwl (Charles Holloway) Avoid the Pitfalls of Self-Managing eDiscovery – http://bit.ly/Qrd0tX (Andrew Hinkes) Backgrounder Update: Technology Assisted Review Compendium – Feb. 1 – Sept. 10, 2012 – http://bit.ly/IiTGtb (@OrangeLT) Criminal E-Discovery: 21st Century Paperless Trails (Part 3 of 5) http://bit.ly/NmjN8L (Daniel Garrie) Drilling Down Into Texas Electronic Discovery http://bit.ly/PLxRG3 (Timothy Mountz, Charles Strecker)… [read post]
31 Mar 2009, 1:57 pm
  That approach was also affirmed by the current Supreme Court in the ITW v. [read post]
21 Jan 2007, 5:42 pm
(For some original analysis of these issues, and a sure-to-be-provocative proposal, see Craig Alan Nard and John Duffy’s recent working paper calling for patent issues to be spread among two or more appellate circuits: “Rethinking Patent Law's Uniformity Principle. [read post]
8 Oct 2017, 7:57 pm by Camilla Alexandra Hrdy
Holbrook's short essay is part of a long line of scholarship addressing the question of Supreme Court review in patent law, including papers by, to name just a few,  John Duffy, Robin Feldman, and Peter Lee.One of the reigning theories that Holbrook and others note for the Court's scrutiny of the Federal Circuit is the Court's concern for so-called "patent exceptionalism. [read post]
4 Apr 2011, 3:37 pm by McNabb Associates, P.C.
ARTICLE V (1) Neither of the Contracting Parties shall be bound to deliver up its own nationals under this Treaty but the executive authority of each Contracting Party shall have the power to deliver them up if, in its discretion, it considers that it is proper to do so. (2) For the purposes of this Article - (a) a reference to the executive authority of a Contracting Party shall, in the case of Australia, be construed as a reference to the Attorney-General of Australia; (b) Australian… [read post]