Search for: "Johnson v. Shields" Results 201 - 220 of 272
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
8 Apr 2016, 10:11 am by John Elwood
Hamilton Bank of Johnson City, Arrigoni’s claim was not ripe because had not exhausted his state means for obtaining relief for the alleged inverse condemnation. [read post]
6 Dec 2019, 12:03 pm by Bona Law PC
Author: Luke Hasskamp This article—the third in a series—focuses on the Supreme Court’s decision in Federal Baseball Club v. [read post]
5 Dec 2008, 3:00 pm
(The Prior Art) Ways to avoid a USPTO ethics investigation (IP Updates)   US Patents – Decisions CAFC: Qualcomm penalised for failure to disclose patents to standard setting organisation and for litigation misconduct in failing to produce evidence: Qualcomm Inc v Broadcom Corp (IP Law Observer) (Patently-O) (Promote the Progress) (Law360) (Patent Prospector) (Hal Wegner) (PLI) CAFC upholds judgment enjoining inventor from asserting patent against Unitronics or its… [read post]
24 Jun 2010, 5:00 am by Bexis
June 18, 1982) (Dalkon Shield – personal injury). [read post]
12 Feb 2021, 11:17 am by Eric Goldman
The First Amendment sets a floor on speech, not a ceiling, and legislatures can and do protect speech more than the First Amendment requires (other examples: reporter shield, defamation retraction, Consumer Review Fairness Act). [read post]
12 Nov 2015, 11:30 am by John Elwood
“Qualified immunity,” the per curiam opinion reads, “shields officials from civil liability so long as their conduct does not violate clearly established statutory or constitutional rights of which a reasonable person would have known. [read post]
17 May 2015, 4:40 pm by INFORRM
How CJEU’s ‘Privacy Spring’ Construed the Human Rights Shield in the Digital Age, Forthcoming in “European judicial systems as a challenge f [read post]
8 Feb 2012, 2:56 pm by Eugene Volokh
(Cf Hurley v Irish-American Gay, Lesbian and Bisexual Group of Boston, Inc., 515 US 557, 574 [1995] ["the point of all speech protection ... is to shield just those choices of content that in someone's eyes are misguided, or even hurtful. [read post]
8 Feb 2012, 2:56 pm by Eugene Volokh
(Cf Hurley v Irish-American Gay, Lesbian and Bisexual Group of Boston, Inc., 515 US 557, 574 [1995] ["the point of all speech protection ... is to shield just those choices of content that in someone's eyes are misguided, or even hurtful."]; Texas v Johnson, 491 US 397, 414[1989] ["If there is a bedrock principle underlying the First Amendment, it is that the government may not prohibit the expression of an idea simply because society finds the idea itself… [read post]
24 Jun 2021, 10:12 am by John Elwood
The PSBA, in turn, argued that the First Amendment protects its right to sue in state court, and it defended against Campbell’s federal lawsuit by invoking the Noerr-Pennington doctrine, which shields constitutionally protected conduct from civil liability, subject to certain exceptions. [read post]
9 Feb 2020, 4:05 pm by INFORRM
Prime Minister Boris Johnson confirmed the UK will seek to diverge from EU data protection rules and establish their own ‘sovereign’ controls in the field. [read post]