Search for: "Jones v. Grant"
Results 201 - 220
of 2,718
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
30 Mar 2015, 11:55 am
Supreme Court granted cert and vacated and remanded without argument. [read post]
29 Jun 2015, 5:24 pm
So the Ninth Circuit held last Friday in Jones v. [read post]
28 Apr 2011, 2:27 pm
UNITED STATES, AND THIS COURT’S RECENT OPINIONS IN MEDINA, MILLER, AND JONES. [read post]
21 Aug 2021, 3:45 pm
To reach this conclusion, the Court contrasts the Miller opinion with the categorical bars in Roper and Graham and the Supreme Court’s recent decision in Jones v. [read post]
9 Oct 2009, 11:54 am
Below, Alexis Grant previews Alvarez v. [read post]
26 May 2012, 5:21 am
United States v. [read post]
29 Jan 2019, 5:25 pm
The Jones Act or Maritime Law requires that vessels moving goods between U.S. ports are owned and operated by U.S. citizens or permanent residents. [read post]
1 Apr 2010, 6:31 am
Check the Jones v. [read post]
18 May 2020, 10:29 pm
Recently, in the matter of Kip Jones v. [read post]
22 Sep 2015, 7:11 am
Glaze v. [read post]
21 Sep 2007, 10:22 am
Jones v. [read post]
12 Jan 2015, 7:42 am
The trial court, which had originally denied the motion to suppress, granted the motion on reconsideration after Jones was released. [read post]
28 Feb 2008, 6:28 am
Withhart v. [read post]
26 Mar 2014, 9:48 am
In Jones v. [read post]
11 Oct 2017, 4:12 pm
Perpetual injunction under DPA Applying the approach in Law Society v Kordowski [2011] 3185 (QB), Whipple J granted a perpetual injunction against Mr Sambhi under section 10(4) DPA. [read post]
24 May 2007, 1:42 pm
In Hicks v. [read post]
15 Jul 2011, 6:00 am
Based on that determination, the defendants’ motions for summary judgment were granted and Richardson’s Jones Act claims were dismissed. [read post]
1 Dec 2014, 4:38 am
See Clinton v. [read post]
10 Mar 2014, 7:12 am
Under its rules, the Court grants certiorari when at least four of the nine justices are interested in a given case; it takes five justices to make a majority.This was potentially a huge decision for those suffering from years of the courts' misreading of Jones v. [read post]
1 Jun 2016, 2:01 pm
In Jones v. [read post]
