Search for: "Jones v. Hall"
Results 201 - 220
of 311
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
27 Feb 2009, 6:00 am
’ (Ars Technica) (Excess Copyright) (Techdirt) Report on Digital Music Forum East – ISP liability for copyright infringement (Media Wonk) (Media Wonk) Public Knowledge testifies to Congress on cable and satellite copyright (Public Knowledge) (Public Knowledge) (Public Knowledge) US Copyright – Decisions District Court N D Illinois: Website not sufficient to create personal jurisdiction: Richter v INSTAR Enterprises (Chicago Intellectual Property Law… [read post]
17 Nov 2014, 5:26 pm
Raich v. [read post]
25 Mar 2013, 2:41 am
Journalism and regulation There are no new PCC adjudications to report, but a few resolved cases: Richard Jones v Daily Mail, Clause 1, 22/03/2013; Levy & McRae Solicitors, on behalf of Christopher and Mary Gorman v The Sun, Clause 1, 22/03/2013; Mr Dean Torkington v The Sunday Times, Clause 1, 22/03/2013; Dr Helen Hammond v The Daily Telegraph, Clause 1, 22/03/2013; Basim Shamsuddin v The Mail on Sunday, Clause 1, 19/03/2013; Noveprim Group… [read post]
1 Dec 2019, 4:05 pm
Judgments The following reserved judgments after public hearings in media law cases are outstanding: W M Morrison Supermarkets plc v Various Claimants, heard 6 and 7 November 2019 (Lady Hale and Lords Reed, Kerr, Hodge and Lloyd-Jones) Turley v Unite the Union, heard 11 to 15 and 19 November 2019 (Nicklin J) Kirkegaard v Smith, heard 26 November 2019 (Julian Knowles J). [read post]
13 Oct 2011, 3:47 pm
Schlumberger Technology Corporation v. [read post]
30 Jun 2010, 2:55 pm
Hall, the Court summarily ruled in favor of a death penalty defendant. [read post]
15 Apr 2013, 7:56 am
In Vernon Kay v Reveal, the television and radio presenter Vernon Kay complained through his representatives, Hackford Jones, about the accuracy of an article headlined “Vernon’s still walking on eggshells“, published in Reveal magazine in July 2013. [read post]
1 Nov 2016, 3:34 pm
To a packed hall of well over 200 attendees, Prof. [read post]
8 Sep 2022, 5:35 am
Jones,[13] if the story is sufficiently focused on Pennsylvania—for instance, if it expressly discusses Norton and Glenn as being Pennsylvania residents saying things about each other in Pennsylvania—then Pennsylvania may well have personal jurisdiction over the lawsuit against Fox. [read post]
26 Jun 2019, 3:24 pm
(relisted after the June 20 conference) Hall v. [read post]
15 Sep 2020, 8:56 am
Payne has an intellectual disability and that he meets all of the criteria for intellectual disability under Atkins v. [read post]
16 Sep 2020, 8:12 am
Supreme Court barred the execution of people with intellectual disability in Atkins v. [read post]
27 Jun 2010, 9:36 pm
Get to Jones Beach on Long Island and catch up with some sun. [read post]
4 Apr 2011, 5:12 am
Second, this week the Supreme Court ruled in the case of Jones v Kaney that expert witnesses are no longer immune from civil suits. [read post]
1 Jul 2023, 11:27 pm
Quick links Peter Frost, Chris Jones and Josh Peters, Lexology: UK: EAT provides welcome guidance on proportionality in belief/freedom of expression cases: on Higgs v Farmor’s School. [read post]
19 Feb 2024, 1:45 am
(2023), Independent; Universidad de las Americas Puebla Erdos, David, Data Protection Reform via the Retained EU Law (Revocation and Repeal) Act and the Data Protection (Fundamental Rights and Freedoms) (Amendment) Regulations 2023/1417: Arguably Partially Unlawful and Liable to Undercut the UK’s Council of Europe Commitmen(2024), University of Cambridge – Faculty of Law; Trinity Hall Hu, Ying, Unjust Enrichment Law and AI (2023), The Cambridge Handbook of Private Law and… [read post]
24 May 2010, 9:10 pm
As usually happens, this week’s edition includes substantial borrowings from Steve Hall’s Stand Down blog. [read post]
2 Jun 2019, 4:40 am
”Herein, it seems important to discuss the case of Keep Thomson v. [read post]
18 Nov 2007, 9:03 pm
On November 9, 2007, the appellant filed a successive motion to vacate judgment and sentence pursuant to Fl.R.Cr.P. 3.851(e)(2) based on "new evidence truly demonstrating that Schwab could not control his conduct" which, under Jones v. [read post]
18 Nov 2007, 9:03 pm
On November 9, 2007, the appellant filed a successive motion to vacate judgment and sentence pursuant to Fl.R.Cr.P. 3.851(e)(2) based on "new evidence truly demonstrating that Schwab could not control his conduct" which, under Jones v. [read post]
