Search for: "Jones v. The People of the State of New York" Results 201 - 220 of 537
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
14 Jul 2017, 2:38 pm
City of New York, 40 N.Y.2d 30, 35 [1976]; People v. [read post]
25 Jun 2017, 4:11 pm by INFORRM
On 21 June 2017 Warby J heard an application in the case of RJH v News Group Newspapers. [read post]
23 Jun 2017, 4:25 am by Edith Roberts
In an op-ed in The New York Times, Linda Greenhouse looks at Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg’s opinion for the court in Sessions v. [read post]
25 Apr 2017, 1:12 pm by Chris Castle
 All of the proxies started dancing (you can find most of them on the venerable Google Shill List from the Oracle v. [read post]
24 Apr 2017, 8:33 am by Quinta Jurecic
@POTUS is a digital metonym for the office of the Presidency: a vessel filled in turn by each new occupant. [read post]
18 Apr 2017, 6:15 pm by Morgan Weiland
Kalven, Harry, The New York Times Case: A Note on “The Central Meaning of the First Amendment”, 1964 Sup. [read post]
17 Apr 2017, 1:26 pm
The second touches on the nature of the rights of individuals and is rooted in international law (and sometimes domestic constitutional law) defining the scope of the human rights of individuals and the consequential obligations of states and legal persons. [read post]
13 Apr 2017, 9:01 pm by John Dean
Zervos filed in a New York state court rather than a federal court. [read post]
6 Apr 2017, 9:01 pm by Vikram David Amar
Trump’s reality-TV show, The Apprentice—filed suit against him in New York state court, alleging that he had defamed her in responding to her accusations of sexual misconduct, made during the 2016 presidential campaign. [read post]
22 Mar 2017, 11:06 am by Eric Goldman
See, e.g., Jones v. thedirty (“An adoption or ratification theory, however, is not only inconsistent with the material contribution standard of “development” but also abuses the concept of responsibility. [read post]
5 Mar 2017, 4:05 pm by INFORRM
The new FCC chairman has announced plans to stop a privacy rule that would limit what internet service providers can do with people’s private data. [read post]
3 Mar 2017, 2:00 am by SOG Staff
As the New York Times reports, the United States Supreme Court heard oral argument this week in Packingham v. [read post]
3 Mar 2017, 2:00 am by SOG Staff
As the New York Times reports, the United States Supreme Court heard oral argument this week in Packingham v. [read post]