Search for: "Jordan v. Texas" Results 201 - 220 of 301
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
24 Jul 2012, 10:19 am by Gritsforbreakfast
  The term "Terry frisks" comes from the Supreme Court decision Terry v. [read post]
13 Jul 2012, 12:18 pm by Teri Rodriguez
The following reporters will be presented with an award on August 10 at the Freedom of Information Foundation of Texas annual conference in Austin: Jordan Smith, The Austin Chronicle, “The Science of Injustice” Kevin Krause and Ed Timms, The Dallas Morning News, “Bail Bondsmen: Working the Numbers” Jeff Prince, Fort Worth Weekly, “The Power of Alienation” Mandy Oaklander, Houston Press, “Life Without Parole” … [read post]
22 Jun 2012, 9:06 am by ParkerMcDonald
Alex Ford was a 20-year old student at Tarrant County College in Fort Worth, with aspirations of attending the University of Texas. [read post]
24 Apr 2012, 6:39 am by Nabiha Syed
The Daily Texan reports that the University of Texas has hired the firm of Latham & Watkins to represent the University in Fisher v. [read post]
16 Apr 2012, 3:11 am by New Books Script
Bristol : Jordans, 2011 K 795 G53 2011 The international trust / general editor David Hayton. [read post]
4 Apr 2012, 8:13 am by John Elwood
  Like Dorsey, Hill, and oh-so-many others, Jordan v. [read post]
30 Mar 2012, 6:14 am by Gritsforbreakfast
That compensation law is one thing Texas does right compared to other states. [read post]
2 Feb 2012, 10:31 pm by Paul Caron
Jordan Barry (San Diego), Patricia Cain (Santa Clara), Bryan Camp (Texas Tech) & Keith Fogg (Villanova) have filed Amicus Curiae Brief in Health and Human Services v. [read post]
26 Dec 2011, 8:20 am by Gritsforbreakfast
Jordan Smith at the Austin Chronicle is more focused on whether "whether current D.A. [read post]
15 Dec 2011, 8:24 pm by legalinformatics
Jason Jordan, University of North Texas: De Jure Blackness: Racialization in Brown v. [read post]
4 Aug 2011, 1:07 pm by Bexis
Aug. 24, 1990) (rejecting argument that defense expert should have been excluded for lack of certainty; “[r]easonable medical probability is for the fact finder to determine, and testimony regarding the possible causes of an injury is admissible”) (unpublished; applying Texas law); Jordan v. [read post]