Search for: "Joseph Scott v." Results 201 - 220 of 488
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
28 Jun 2016, 4:30 am by Amy Howe
Lee comes from Joseph Palys (and others) at The George Washington Law Review’s On the Docket. [read post]
25 May 2016, 2:20 am by Amy Howe
Scott Oswald at The Employment Law Group. [read post]
20 May 2016, 1:15 pm by Eugene Volokh
I’m delighted to report that the Michigan Court of Appeals has just upheld a Twitter parodist’s First Amendment claim in the “badass lawyer” case, Levitt v. [read post]
20 May 2016, 6:45 am
McLaughlin and Yafit Cohn, Simpson Thacher & Bartlett LLP, on Friday, May 13, 2016 Tags: Acquisition agreements, Contracts, Corporate fraud, Delaware cases, Delaware law, Due diligence, Fair values,Fairness review, Liability standards, Merger litigation, Mergers & acquisitions, Reliance Genuine Parts Co. v. [read post]
18 May 2016, 9:01 pm by Marci A. Hamilton
Joseph Kennedy III and Bobby Scott introduced the “Do No Harm Act. [read post]
1 May 2016, 9:05 pm by Walter Olson
How the courts came to extend First Amendment protection to art, music, movies, and other expression not originally classed as “press” or “speech” [new Mark Tushnet, Alan Chen, and Joseph Blocher book via Ronald Collins] Cato amicus: church enterprises should be eligible for recycling program on same terms as secular businesses [Ilya Shapiro and Jayme Weber] “A Political Attack On Free Speech And Privacy Thwarted — For Now” [George Leef, Forbes… [read post]
6 Mar 2016, 4:44 pm by INFORRM
On 1 March 2016, Sharp and Hamblen LJJ heard a renewed application for permission to appeal in the case of Sloutsker v Romanova. [read post]
28 Dec 2015, 2:51 am by Ben
In Europe, The Court of Justice of the European Union ruled that the consent of a copyright holder does not cover the distribution of an object incorporating a work where that object has been altered after its initial marketing to such an extent that it constitutes a new reproduction of that work (Case C‑419/13, Art & Allposters International BV v Stichting Pictoright) with Eleonora opining that the decision means that that there is no such thing as a general principle of… [read post]
10 Oct 2015, 9:13 pm by Patent Docs
Holt, and Scott Weingust will give a brief overview of how patent valuation is conducted and when it should be considered, discuss the factors that affect the value of a patent, including the American Invents Act and recent case law (CLS Bank v.... [read post]
9 Sep 2015, 8:08 am by Martha Ertman
 Likewise, the 1879 Supreme Court case Reynolds v. [read post]
28 Aug 2015, 9:36 am
(Thanks to Sina Safvati, Daniel Simkin, and Sabine Tsuruda, the Scott & Cyan Banister First Amendment Clinic students who worked on the brief.) [read post]
13 Aug 2015, 8:02 am
 Christianson, Scott (2006) Innocent: Inside Wrongful Conviction Cases. [read post]
11 Aug 2015, 4:29 am
The plaintiff, graffiti artist, Rime (Joseph Tierney), has initiated a claim against Moschino Fashion House and designer Jeremy Scott for alleged infringement of copyright, a false designation of origin under s.43(a) of the Lanham Act [= 15 USC § 1125] and breach of his right of publicity. [read post]
15 Jul 2015, 9:05 pm by Walter Olson
“Philadelphia To Seize 1,330 Properties For Public Redevelopment” [Scott Beyer, more] Influencing proceedings against Chevron: “Documents Reveal Ecuadorian Government Organized Protests on U.S. [read post]
1 Jun 2015, 5:38 am
If you’re interested, you can find the briefs here, but let me quote my students’ and my amicus brief in the case, filed through the UCLA Scott & Cyan Banister First Amendment Clinic, on behalf of Profs. [read post]