Search for: "Joseph v. District of Columbia" Results 201 - 220 of 275
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
20 Jul 2011, 9:09 pm by Dan Ernst
[Earlier I noted an event sponsored by the Historical Society of the District of Columbia Circuit, entitled "The DC Circuit in the McCarthy Era: United States v. [read post]
9 Jul 2011, 7:28 pm
According to the District of Columbia Rules of Professional Conduct, it appears that Rakofsky may be engaging in the unauthorized practice of law in Washington, DC. [read post]
6 Jul 2011, 12:32 pm by Sheldon Toplitt
District Court for the District of Columbia will hear Joseph Farah, Jerome Corsi et al. v. [read post]
20 Jun 2011, 4:27 am by Marie Louise
: BPAI decision in Ex parte Lacks Industries (WHDA) District Court E D Virginia: Non-practicing entity’s  choice of forum not entitled to deference: Adiscov, L.L.C. v. [read post]
2 Jun 2011, 12:46 pm by Bexis
Jan. 12, 1987), federal district courts held that the rule precluded pharmacist liability. [read post]
13 May 2011, 2:11 pm by George M. Wallace
In early April of this year, a young attorney made what looks to have been a mistake: as reported in the Washington Post and elsewhere, New Jersey attorney Joseph Rakofsky, less than a year out of law school, took on the defense of a murder trial in the District of Columbia. [read post]
12 Apr 2011, 9:00 pm by Lawrence Solum
In Dead or Alive: Originalism as Popular Constitutionalism in Heller, her trenchant analysis of popular constitutionalism in District of Columbia v. [read post]
21 Mar 2011, 9:14 am by Mike Scarcella
District Court for the District of Columbia not to approve $60.8 million. [read post]
23 Feb 2011, 4:02 pm by INFORRM
New South Wales District Court Judge Judith Gibson argues the case for reform in a paper she delivered on 29 November 2010 to the Intellectual Property, Media and Communications Law Roundtable held at UTS. [read post]
8 Nov 2010, 9:03 am by Lawrence Solum
I argue that the "ugly American" hermeneutics exemplified in Justice Scalia's opinion in District of Columbia v. [read post]
7 Nov 2010, 4:03 pm by INFORRM
Spiller v Joseph heard 26 and 27 July 2010 (Lords Phillips, Rodger, Walker and Brown and Sir John Dyson). [read post]
4 Oct 2010, 1:44 am by Kelly
Ambu AS (Patently-O) CAFC: Preamble held not limiting because body of claim sets forth complete invention: American Medical Systems v Biolitec (Filewrapper) District Court E D Michigan: General allegations of deceptive intent fail to state a claim for false marking: Josephs v. [read post]