Search for: "Julie Lang"
Results 201 - 220
of 585
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
28 Sep 2020, 8:10 am
In July 2018, Huiya, after receiving Linklinear’s warning letter asserting that Huiya’s molding devices infringed Linklinear’s ‘826 Patent and passed the waiting period, filed a declaratory judgement action in the Shanghai IP Court, asking the court to rule that there was no infringement of the ‘826 Patent. [read post]
26 Sep 2020, 4:25 am
Is the Hague Convention of 2 July 2019 a useful tool for companies who are conducting international activities? [read post]
25 Sep 2020, 4:17 am
Is the Hague Convention of 2 July 2019 a useful tool for companies who are conducting international activities? [read post]
11 Sep 2020, 7:43 am
Last July, the UK withdrew its ratification of the Unified Patent Court Agreement as a consequence of the Brexit. [read post]
10 Sep 2020, 3:00 am
July 1, 2020). [read post]
7 Sep 2020, 6:37 am
The facts of the case can be summarized as follows: On 31 July 2015 company X filed a complaint against company Y and against one Ms Inmaculada, exercising two different legal actions against them: an action against company Y aimed at claiming the ownership of a utility model and an unfair competition action against Ms Inmaculada. [read post]
1 Sep 2020, 6:25 am
Schwenkel and Andrea Gede-Lange are partners at Fried, Frank, Harris, Shriver & Jacobson LLP. [read post]
29 Aug 2020, 9:49 pm
Becerra, July 24, 2020, per curiam). [read post]
27 Aug 2020, 5:01 am
Our Nevada report dated July 10, before the August primary, is available here. [read post]
26 Aug 2020, 8:31 am
Another chapter in the pemetrexed saga: Barcelona Commercial Court No. 4 has ruled on infringement in the very first case worldwide concerning pemetrexed diarginine, a salt form of pemetrexed chosen by Sandoz in the wake of the outcome of the landmark Actavis case of the Supreme Court of the United Kingdom (Judgment dated 12 July 2017). [read post]
24 Aug 2020, 4:20 am
In her judgment, handed down in April 2020, Mrs Justice Lang found that the NCA’s assumptions relating to the requirements which must be met in order to obtain a UWO were “unreliable”. [read post]
3 Aug 2020, 7:02 am
Mr Justice Morgan handed down judgment on 22 July 2020 ([2020] EWHC 1968 (Pat)) in relation to two patent infringement actions brought by Lufthansa which were heard together. [read post]
21 Jul 2020, 2:40 am
However, this changed on 8 July 2020, when the Court of Appeal handed down its judgment in the above appeal. [read post]
20 Jul 2020, 11:20 am
In the meantime, what is clear is that the judgment of 12 July 2017, far from being an act of “judicial colonialism”, is an act of judicial generosity. [read post]
20 Jul 2020, 5:03 am
Today, by means of a Note Verbale, the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland has withdrawn its ratification of the Agreement on a Unified Patent Court and the Protocol on Privileges and Immunities of the Unified Patent Court (dated 23 April 2018) in respect of the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland and the Isle of Man, and its consent to be bound by the Protocol to the Agreement on a Unified Patent Court on provisional application (dated on 6 July 2017)… [read post]
18 Jul 2020, 3:34 am
Full support for the Unified Patent Court Agreement, complete rejection, long lists with points of concern. [read post]
16 Jul 2020, 5:31 am
In a letter of 15 July 2020, Thierry Breton wrote: “The unitary patent will be an effective tool for businesses to protect their inventions on the European market at a competitive price, and the Unified Patent Court will offer the possibility for these businesses to enforce their patents at a European Union level, thereby enhancing legal certainty and reducing costs. [read post]
10 Jul 2020, 9:56 am
The next one is on Wednesday, July 15, 2020, 12:00-1:00 pm, ET, and focuses on mediators causing impasses. [read post]
1 Jul 2020, 9:05 pm
Negotiations on a free trade agreement (FTA) took place from June 15 to 26 with the next session planned for the end of July. [read post]
15 May 2020, 4:52 am
“In order to ensure legal certainty and to protect the legitimate interests of patent proprietors and applicants, the Enlarged Board ruled that the new interpretation of Article 53(b) EPC given in G 3/19 had no retroactive effect on European patents containing such claims which were granted before 1 July 2017, or on pending European patent applications seeking protection for such claims which were filed before that date. [read post]
