Search for: "KAY v. STATE"
Results 201 - 220
of 639
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
23 Jun 2008, 10:12 am
Kay, 2008 NYSlipOp 03710.Here, similarly, is a Texas Case, reported in the Southeastern Texas Record. [read post]
3 Apr 2024, 11:26 am
Case Citation: U.S. v. [read post]
30 Aug 2018, 4:44 pm
In an August 24, 2018 opinion in United States v. [read post]
31 Jan 2011, 10:00 pm
Judgment of the Court of Appeal The judgment of the Court of Appeal was delivered by Lord Neuberger MR (with whom Maurice Kay and Smith LJJ agreed). [read post]
13 Jul 2009, 3:29 pm
Unlike Connors or Kay, Ms Stokes had not lawfully lived on the pitch for a number of years. [read post]
2 Jun 2008, 9:28 am
United States, 985 F.2d 1574, 1582 (Fed. [read post]
2 Feb 2014, 3:30 pm
Solihull Metropolitan Borough Council v Khan [2014] EWCA Civ 41 A rather odd second appeal from a s.204 appeal decision. [read post]
2 Feb 2014, 3:30 pm
Solihull Metropolitan Borough Council v Khan [2014] EWCA Civ 41 A rather odd second appeal from a s.204 appeal decision. [read post]
3 Mar 2009, 4:33 pm
Unlike Kay v Lambeth and Connors, both Smith v Evans and the present case involved proceedings brought after s.211 of the Housing Act 2004 came into effect, amending s.4 Caravan Sites Act 1968 to remove the exemption of local authorities from the court’s power to suspend execution of a possession order,. [read post]
28 Mar 2007, 10:20 am
State of Indiana (NFP) Dewayne Coleman v. [read post]
4 Nov 2008, 6:11 pm
R (RJM) (FC) v Secretary of State for Work and Pensions [2008] UKHL 63 This House of Lords judgment is now just under two weeks old, but I think it is still worthy of comment here. [read post]
6 Apr 2008, 2:26 pm
That is the effect of the decision of the Court of Appeal in Kay v. [read post]
24 Jun 2022, 9:30 pm
She will speak about Dobbs v. [read post]
1 Jul 2012, 10:10 am
There are some very nice and straightforward clarifications in the recent Federal Court decision inWarman v. [read post]
19 Jan 2012, 8:30 am
Kay, P.C. v. [read post]
12 Oct 2008, 12:55 pm
The European Court of Human Rights has made clear in Connors v UK (2005) 40 EHRR 9 and McCann v UK (19009/04), that each person faced with eviction proceedings should be able to have a court assess the proportionality of the proposed eviction and, whilst the House of Lords haven’t quite gone as far as this yet, in both Kay v LB Lambeth [2006] UKHL 10; [2006] 2 AC 465 and Doherty v Birmingham CC [2008] UKHL 57, they made clear that the approach… [read post]
1 Jun 2021, 7:30 am
Supreme Court, in Kameny v. [read post]
18 Feb 2015, 3:25 pm
In Pleau v. [read post]
7 Dec 2014, 3:01 pm
The first medical records class action is Hopkins v. [read post]
26 Oct 2013, 5:59 am
The 1987 Texas Supreme Court opinion styled McGovern v. [read post]
