Search for: "Keenan v. State"
Results 201 - 220
of 268
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
29 Aug 2009, 10:51 am
In its next First Amendment pronouncement, in Keenan v. [read post]
29 Mar 2015, 4:02 pm
United States Georgia’s Supreme Court has ruled against a woman who claimed she was stalked online. [read post]
23 Jun 2011, 7:15 am
In its next First Amendment pronouncement, in Keenan v. [read post]
6 Jul 2007, 12:51 am
Prosecutors say that Keenan gave Dareon Varner a 14-inch pruning saw blade. [read post]
12 Feb 2012, 1:16 pm
Subsequent case law has found that the duty might (depending on the facts of specific cases) apply to the following situations: prison authorities protecting inmates from harm from other prisoners [Edwards v UK (2002) 36 EHRR 487], or from suicide [Keenan v UK (2001) 33 EHRR 913]; immigrants in administrative detention [Slimani v France (2006) 43 EHRR 49]; military conscripts [Lilinc V Turkey (App. [read post]
12 Oct 2011, 9:02 am
The Fourth Circuit yesterday issued an en banc opinion in United States v. [read post]
12 Oct 2011, 6:28 am
The Fourth Circuit yesterday issued an en banc opinion in United States v. [read post]
12 Dec 2017, 10:00 am
Knauff v. [read post]
3 Mar 2010, 3:25 am
Supreme Court will almost certainly extend the scope of the Second Amendment right to bear arms to limit state and federal regulation of firearms, based on oral arguments today in McDonald v. [read post]
20 Jul 2007, 12:16 pm
State of Indiana (NFP) Paul Wagner v. [read post]
29 Sep 2022, 3:56 am
The 2020 Supreme Court case Bostock v. [read post]
1 Sep 2011, 3:42 am
In 1988, the state botched D’Ambrosio’s trial by violating Brady v. [read post]
30 Dec 2011, 3:20 am
Fla. 2009); Keenan Hopkins Schmidt and Stowell Contractors, Inc. v. [read post]
13 Nov 2012, 11:54 am
A stockbroker cannot recommend a security unless there is an adequate and reasonable basis for such recommendation.andnbsp; Keenan v. [read post]
23 Nov 2011, 10:09 am
Not only has she been overseeing the building of a new office in High Holborn (which will be fully open and operational from the beginning of January), she has also found time to write a post on the recent pre-nuptial case Z v Z, and another on Meeting “reasonable needs”: matrimonial v non-matrimonial assets. [read post]
13 Jan 2010, 6:00 am
This decision is worth reading for civil rights lawyers also, since the principles are the same.The case is House v. [read post]
18 Jul 2019, 8:51 pm
In summary The above decisions demonstrate the ease with which adverse action claims may be brought, the importance of having credible evidence to support the reason for dismissal, and the high potential costs for an employer who does take unlawful adverse action. [1] Employees of employers who are not in the federal workplace relations system, such as small unincorporated businesses or partnerships, cannot bring adverse action claims. [2] Section 341 Fair Work Act 2009. [3] Keenan… [read post]
23 Mar 2009, 6:05 pm
In conclusion, if Obama is going to accomplish the stated goal of eliminating the wasteful spending he needs to start where the health care buck stops - in the stakeholders' corporate pockets. [read post]
29 Mar 2018, 8:00 am
Tripp v. [read post]
17 Apr 2012, 9:19 am
If someone else made the comments, not so much.The case is Chao v. [read post]
