Search for: "Kennedy v. Sale"
Results 201 - 220
of 633
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
6 Apr 2017, 12:35 pm
Honeycutt v. [read post]
28 Oct 2012, 11:56 am
That was basically the issue in Euro-Excellence v. [read post]
27 Apr 2011, 11:46 am
” Laster v. [read post]
24 Jan 2012, 7:32 am
Similarly, in U.S. v. [read post]
10 Nov 2007, 5:29 am
Lobato v. [read post]
26 Feb 2012, 1:00 am
He subsequently offered extracts from recordings of the interviews for sale to the public and insisted on them being played, in full, to the jury at his trial. [read post]
5 Sep 2017, 1:05 am
In Murr v. [read post]
5 Sep 2017, 1:05 am
In Murr v. [read post]
28 Jul 2015, 10:02 am
Supreme Court recently decided a patent-royalty lawsuit, Kimble v. [read post]
30 Oct 2015, 2:17 pm
Hayward v. [read post]
7 Aug 2014, 12:34 am
Klinger v. [read post]
25 Oct 2011, 10:45 am
Standard works (Kennedy's CIF Contracts) and decisions [Johnson v Taylor Bros (1920) AC 144, 155] recognise the following as features of CIF contractsCIF contracts relate to carriage of goods by sea. [read post]
30 Jun 2013, 10:03 pm
Copyright Does the "first sale" doctrine of copyright law defeat claims against U.S. sales of copies that began life overseas? [read post]
20 Feb 2009, 11:14 am
In Noonan v. [read post]
23 Jun 2011, 6:20 pm
Jane wrote an amicus brief in IMS v. [read post]
14 Nov 2011, 3:31 am
The 1st District holds that that’s all the trial court could do; the judge wasn’t allowed to merge the defendant’s convictions for preparation for sale and sale of cocaine, and couldn’t make the sentences concurrent instead of consecutive… A trial court didn’t abuse its discretion in refusing to tell the jury that it had found the child victim incompetent to testify, the 2nd District holds in State v. [read post]
14 Jun 2010, 7:28 am
The vote is 5-4, with a dissent by Chief Justice Roberts, joined by Justices Stevens, Scalia, and Kennedy. [read post]
20 Feb 2018, 3:33 am
First up is Currier v. [read post]
23 Jun 2011, 3:14 pm
The case of Sorrell v. [read post]
19 Oct 2011, 8:29 am
McIntyre Machinery Ltd. v. [read post]
