Search for: "Kerr v. State"
Results 201 - 220
of 1,967
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
9 Jun 2019, 4:26 pm
The first full week of term will see the hand down on Wednesday 12 June 2019 by the Supreme Court (Lords Kerr, Wilson, Sumption, Hodge, and Briggs) of its long awaited judgment in the “serious harm” case of Lachaux v Independent Print. [read post]
7 Jun 2019, 7:38 am
In People v. [read post]
23 May 2019, 4:26 am
The justices were also divided as to how to answer this question, with Lord Kerr and Lady Hale agreeing with Lord Carnwath; Lords Lloyd-Jones, Reed and Sumption declining to give a view; and Lord Wilson dissenting. [read post]
22 May 2019, 4:58 pm
The justices were also divided as to how to answer this question, with Lord Kerr and Lady Hale agreeing with Lord Carnwath; Lords Lloyd-Jones, Reed and Sumption declining to give a view; and Lord Wilson dissenting. [read post]
21 May 2019, 12:34 pm
Chalking Is Not a Search Under the Fourth Amendment The Sixth Circuit relied on United States v. [read post]
20 May 2019, 3:22 am
" See Miranda v. [read post]
15 May 2019, 2:57 am
Also dissenting, Lord Kerr held that the manifestly without reasonable foundation test should not be imported into the national court’s consideration of a measure’s proportionality. [read post]
14 May 2019, 3:22 am
Hall, which held that an individual could sue a state in the courts of a different state. [read post]
1 May 2019, 2:43 pm
See, e.g., United States v. [read post]
29 Apr 2019, 4:48 am
In the intervening years, the Supreme Court has issued some good opinions, such as United States v. [read post]
25 Apr 2019, 4:23 am
Taylor v. [read post]
24 Apr 2019, 5:26 am
Last month, in Commonwealth v. [read post]
23 Apr 2019, 2:49 am
" United States v. [read post]
17 Apr 2019, 4:00 am
As that well-known legal wag Orin Kerr put it, why bother? [read post]
10 Apr 2019, 4:52 pm
In finding for the Claimant, Mitting J stated “…The impression given by the postings to the ordinary reader was a significant and distorting overstatement of what had in fact occurred. [read post]
5 Apr 2019, 4:21 pm
Kerr. [read post]
5 Apr 2019, 4:21 pm
Kerr. [read post]
4 Apr 2019, 7:19 pm
This was certainly the stated view of Mrs Stocker after court. [read post]
3 Apr 2019, 9:32 am
DECISION OF THE SUPREME COURT The Supreme Court composed of President Lady Hale, Lord Kerr, Lord Sumption, Lord Hodge and Lord Briggs unanimously dismissed the appeal. [read post]
1 Apr 2019, 1:00 am
Secretary of State for Work and Pensions v Gubeladze, heard 12-13 Mar 2019. [read post]
