Search for: "Kim v. United States"
Results 201 - 220
of 683
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
23 Jul 2012, 3:00 am
As part of its investigation, the United States served a search warrant on Carpathia. [read post]
9 Aug 2010, 7:52 am
Sure issued his decision in Regan v. [read post]
6 Feb 2024, 3:36 pm
’” (Kim Roosevelt’s amicus brief is just terrific in explaining that Section 3 applies of its own force. [read post]
18 Apr 2016, 2:50 am
Today the Court will hear oral arguments in just one case: United States v. [read post]
4 Oct 2008, 6:20 pm
Kim, 25 F.3d 1426, 1435 (9th Cir. 1994); United States v. [read post]
27 Nov 2023, 6:21 am
So this was different from the troop of Charles V, Holy Roman Emperor, looting during the 16th century. [read post]
28 Mar 2008, 3:01 am
Wong Kim Ark, the Supreme Court held that the 14th Amendment to the Constitution prohibited denial of citizenship to anyone born in the United States. [read post]
5 Mar 2018, 11:03 am
Kim and the delegation discussed preparations for an inter-Korean summit, which would be the first to occur since Kim succeeded his father as leader of North Korea in 2011. [read post]
29 Mar 2022, 5:00 am
Although the federal Hatch Act generally prohibits state and local employeesserving with state or local government entity whose principal employment is in connection with an activity which is financed in whole or in part by loans or grants made by the United States or a Federal agency, from being partisan candidates for elected office, Section 1502(a)(3) of the Act carves out a number of exceptions. [read post]
29 Mar 2022, 5:00 am
Although the federal Hatch Act generally prohibits state and local employeesserving with state or local government entity whose principal employment is in connection with an activity which is financed in whole or in part by loans or grants made by the United States or a Federal agency, from being partisan candidates for elected office, Section 1502(a)(3) of the Act carves out a number of exceptions. [read post]
11 Nov 2010, 5:23 pm
(U.S. 1940) (so are price-fixing agreements); United States v. [read post]
7 Feb 2024, 6:25 pm
That the presidency is not an “office, civil or military, under the United States” for purposes of the first, “Positions” Clause of Section 3. [read post]
13 Sep 2012, 3:01 pm
Wong Kim Ark (which was citing U.S. v Rhodes, noting that one could only be a British subject or a natural-born citizen, and not hold both citizenships): All persons born in the allegiance of the King are natural-born subjects, and all persons born in the allegiance of the United States are natural-born citizens.” LINK [read post]
19 Apr 2018, 11:00 am
At the moment, all Facebook users outside of the United States in Canada—of which there are approximately 1.9 billion—are subject to the data regulations imposed by Facebook’s international headquarters in Ireland. [read post]
13 Jun 2018, 10:18 am
Eliot Kim summarized the latest Foreign Intelligence Sovereign Immunities Act case: Jam v. [read post]
15 Nov 2010, 10:09 am
In United States v. [read post]
15 Sep 2015, 1:08 am
Visitors to the domain arwew now confronted by a notice which states that the FBI has taken control of the site 'pursuant to a seizure warrant issued by a United States District Court'. [read post]
12 Aug 2019, 12:09 pm
Emma DiNapoli and Jacques Singer-Emery described the latest developments of the military commission in United States v. [read post]
22 Mar 2013, 4:17 am
Raul v. [read post]
14 Jun 2013, 11:45 am
The government also determined when the physician had been outside of the United States and charged dates when he was outside the U.S. and there was billing under his number and supervision. [read post]
