Search for: "King v. Commonwealth" Results 201 - 202 of 202
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
4 Nov 2006, 10:03 am
  The court was at pains to emphasize that its decision did not apply "when the process toucheth the King", a distinction based on "the express difference ... between the Case of felony, which (as hath been said) concerneth the Commonwealth, and the suit of any other subject, which is for the particular interest of the party".Compare this to what Justice Stevens wrote about the case. [read post]