Search for: "Koh v. United States"
Results 201 - 220
of 350
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
19 Dec 2012, 4:08 pm
A couple of hours ago Samsung proudly informed Judge Koh of the fact that the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) has tentatively rejected, in a first Office action dated December 29 (mailing date), all 21 claims of U.S. [read post]
16 Feb 2020, 11:31 pm
United States v. [read post]
27 Jun 2008, 4:38 am
Before Guantánamo and its repercussions, the United States boasted the most vibrant system of civil domestic human rights enforcement in the world. [read post]
19 Jun 2019, 11:24 am
The FTC v. [read post]
23 Oct 2015, 7:32 am
Ten days ago, the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit granted summary affirmance (i.e., summary judgment at the appellate stage) of Judge Koh's decision to let Apple collect $450 million from Samsung (against a bond posted years ago) even though one of the patents underlying the related ruling had been held invalid by an in-house court (PTAB) of the United States Patent and Trademark Office. [read post]
23 Jan 2013, 10:38 pm
Grewal, who assists Judge Lucy Koh in a couple of Apple v. [read post]
18 Nov 2013, 8:26 am
[BREAKING NEWS -- STILL ADDING DETAIL]The United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit has just handed Apple a major strategic win. [read post]
19 Jun 2024, 8:22 am
“Section 230 establishes a liability rule for litigation in U.S. courts rather than a conduct rule that applies to actions taken outside the United States…This case is being litigated in the United States, so applying Section 230 as a defense to liability involves a domestic application of Section 230, even if the actions that might otherwise create liability occurred elsewhere. [read post]
8 May 2011, 12:51 am
§ 601(g)–that he live in the United States for at least five years between the ages of 13 and 21. [read post]
10 Mar 2019, 6:42 pm
United States v. [read post]
14 May 2019, 10:36 am
Koh is presiding over. [read post]
14 May 2018, 8:58 am
Koh calls it. [read post]
14 Jun 2012, 12:40 pm
What are we to make of Harold Koh and the State Department’s absence? [read post]
16 Aug 2015, 8:50 am
But the R.A.P. is child’s play, compared to the I.N.A..United States v. [read post]
6 Oct 2020, 1:00 am
Judge Albright of the United States District Court for the Western District of Texas is an outlier in the U.S., and German judges would be slightly more subtle at public events, but their extremist rulings speak louder than any roadshow possibly could.I've saved the most important point for last: what opened the floodgates against all warnings was this year's Unwired Planet v. [read post]
8 Dec 2020, 5:01 am
One type is head-of-state immunity, which attaches only to the individual recognized by the United States as the formal leader of the country. [read post]
12 Nov 2013, 6:29 am
Apple and Samsung square off in the United States District Court for the Northern District of California again, almost 15 months after their previous trial in the same court resulted in a finding of a multiplicity of infringements of more than half a dozen of Apple's intellectual property rights and awarding Apple more than a billion dollars in damages and more than eight months after Judge Lucy Koh, the federal judge presiding over two Apple-Samsung lawsuits in that… [read post]
25 Aug 2015, 12:00 pm
The only judge in the world who has held so far that Apple deserved a patent on that concept is Judge Lucy Koh of the United States District Court for the Northern District of California. [read post]
24 Apr 2017, 10:44 am
At any rate, I would view the $5 per-unit refund to BlackBerry as another indication of my $20 per-unit royalty estimate not having been off base.If Qualcomm's royalty levels are indeed extremely high, it comes as no surprise that various major automative and information and communications technology companies are interested in the ongoing FTC v. [read post]
24 Apr 2012, 8:51 am
— State v. [read post]
