Search for: "Kong v. Justice" Results 201 - 220 of 394
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
31 Dec 2020, 9:03 pm by Joshua Burd
Three liberal justices dissented, and Justice Stephen Breyer separately dissented, questioning the constitutionality of the death penalty by any method. [read post]
6 May 2013, 5:38 am by INFORRM
Constitutional Affairs, Equalities, Home Affairs, Justice and Law – Lord McNally/Lord Taylor of Holbeach, Main Chamber, House of Lords.. [read post]
28 Jul 2019, 4:05 pm by INFORRM
On 22 and 23 July 2019 the same judge heard the trial in the case of Fentiman v Marsh. [read post]
14 Mar 2011, 4:59 am by Marie Louise
– FCAFC decision in Blackmagic Design Pty Ltd v Overliese (IP Whiteboard)   Caribbean Carribean IP: Establishing an arbitral tribunal for the region (IP Watch) Canada Petition launched in opposition to CETA (Michael Geist) Clerical error in the Intellectual Property Office: Repligen Corp. v. [read post]
16 Aug 2023, 10:59 am by Stuart Tubis
But buried deep inside these cases you will find reference to Doran v. 7‐Eleven, 524 F.3d 1034 (9th Cir. 2008). [read post]
20 Mar 2012, 5:07 am by Perry Herzfeld
Throughout, the book refers to cases from a variety of jurisdictions, including England, the EU, the USA, Canada, Hong Kong, Singapore, New Zealand and Australia. [read post]
10 Aug 2014, 5:20 pm by INFORRM
On 5 August 2014, judgment was handed down in Hong Kong in the case of Yeung v Google ([2014] HKCFI 1404). [read post]
7 Jun 2020, 4:34 pm by INFORRM
The Law Society Gazette had a piece “Virtual justice is working – but should not become permanent”. [read post]
27 Mar 2017, 8:02 am by Susan Hennessey, Chris Mirasola
., including servers in Hong Kong, Macau, and Taiwan) “through the Internet” and may perform “remote network inspections” of such computer information systems. [read post]
8 Jul 2009, 2:08 am
In this respect, Naz Foundation is in stark contrast to the extensive discussion of legal history in the case it cites so extensively, Lawrence v. [read post]
8 Apr 2024, 9:01 pm by renholding
On February 28, 2024, President Biden announced an Executive Order (“EO”) directing the Department of Justice (“DOJ”) to promulgate regulations that restrict or prohibit transactions involving certain bulk sensitive personal data or United States Government-related data and countries of concern or covered persons. [read post]