Search for: "Kramer v. United States" Results 201 - 220 of 227
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
29 Jun 2009, 2:59 pm
Carlisle, McNellie, Rini, Kramer & Ulrich LPA, et al. [read post]
28 Jun 2009, 4:44 am
"Markoff and Kramer write that the United States and Russia have differing views on achieving cybersecurity:"The United States is trying to improve cybersecurity by building relationships among international law enforcement agencies. [read post]
18 Jun 2009, 5:19 pm
Obama, President of the United States, et al. [read post]
9 Apr 2009, 4:23 pm
The CFTC appreciates the assistance of the office of the United States Attorney for the Western District of Texas. [read post]
13 Dec 2008, 10:03 am
The district court sentenced him to twenty-seven months of imprisonment, the bottom of the range calculated under the United States Sentencing Guidelines ("Guidelines" or "U.S.S.G. [read post]
6 Dec 2008, 1:15 pm
  The Public and the Courts ,   Greg Caldeira   Part VIII: The Political and Policy Environment of Courts in the United States   35. [read post]
15 Sep 2008, 2:00 am
United States, 389 U.S. 347, 350 (1967), Boyd v. [read post]
25 Aug 2008, 1:11 am
Jerman filed an action challenging the debtcollection practices of the law firm Carlisle, McNellie, Rini, Kramer & Ulrich ("Carlisle"), and Adrienne S. [read post]
1 May 2008, 7:43 am
Furthermore, the Supreme Court have recognized that natural parents have a fundamental liberty interest in the care, custody, and management of their children that does not evaporate, Santosky v Kramer. [read post]
18 Apr 2008, 10:38 am
Federal preemption of state tort claims BIC Pen Corp. v. [read post]
24 Aug 2007, 1:14 am
COURT OF APPEALS, SECOND CIRCUIT Criminal Practice Court Need Not Give Notice Before Imposing Sentence Outside Guidelines Range for Breach of Release Terms United States v. [read post]
21 Mar 2007, 1:12 am
DISTRICT COURTSOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORKCriminal PracticeCourt Denies Sentence Clarification; No Intention To Adjust Sentence on Unrelated State Conviction United States v. [read post]