Search for: "LAWS v. DAVIS" Results 201 - 220 of 6,225
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
20 Nov 2023, 10:37 am by JURIST Staff
Furthermore, it was held in Davis v United States (8th Cir. 1917) that a public trial is broadly defined as a trial at which the public is free to attend. [read post]
18 Nov 2023, 4:28 am by Mark Graber
”  Davis referred to “the portion of the people who choose the officers of the government. [read post]
16 Nov 2023, 11:36 pm by Mark Keenan
Landmark Decision Upholds Validity of Prenuptial Agreements in Recent UK Case Law In the recent case of MN v AN [2023] EWHC 613 (Fam), Mr Justice Moor delivered a judgment that reinforces the English court’s commitment to upholding valid prenuptial agreements. [read post]
13 Nov 2023, 3:30 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
Reargument was therefore properly granted because Supreme Court (McBride, J.) misapplied the controlling law in finding that plaintiff, without an expert affidavit, had sufficiently raised a question of fact (see Davis v Zeh, 200 AD3d 1275, 1280 [3d Dept 2021]; Cascade Bldrs. [read post]
10 Nov 2023, 6:04 pm
  Your Miranda rights come from the Supreme Court decision of Miranda v. [read post]
6 Nov 2023, 2:42 pm by bndmorris
Brandon Beck was the guest speaker at the Duke University School of Law’s Second Amendment Seminar on October 10, 2023 (1 hr. 15 min.), talking about Davis, Rahimi, and the Supreme Court. [read post]
2 Nov 2023, 11:15 am by Unknown
Davis, 533 U.S. 678 (2001) [preprint]- Chapter 15: Commentary on Department of Homeland Security v. [read post]
31 Oct 2023, 8:00 am by Paul Caron
Tax Prof Amicus Briefs for the Government: John Brooks (Fordham), David Gamage (Indiana) Brian Galle (Georgetown), Cliff Fleming (BYU), Jacob Goldin (Chicago), Edward McCaffery (USC), Ajay Mehrotra (Northwestern), Richard Schmalbeck (Duke) Ari Glogower (Northwestern), David Kamin (NYU), Rebecca Kysar (Fordham), Darien Shanske (UC-Davis), NYU Tax Law Center Andy Grewal (Iowa)... [read post]
27 Oct 2023, 11:18 am by Eugene Volokh
" The Supreme Court extended these Title VII hostile environment cases to the Title IX context in Davis v. [read post]
18 Oct 2023, 3:11 am by SHG
An employer or any other person or entity that violates this chapter is guilty of a misdemeanor… Before you ask, sure, that would seem to mean that if an employee (and applicant for employment as well as stated in a footnote in Gay Law Students Ass’n v. [read post]