Search for: "Lady v State" Results 201 - 220 of 1,744
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
15 May 2012, 7:48 am by Aileen McColgan, Matrix.
Lady Hale reviewed the authorities at domestic and CJEU level (the latter consisting of no fewer than 12 cases from Mangold v Helm [2006] 1 CML 1132 to and Case C-447/09 Prigge & Ors v Deutsche Lufthansa AG [2011] IRLR 1052). [read post]
Lady Black’s judgment Lady Black extensively reviewed the authorities, beginning with the landmark judgments of the House of Lords in   In re F (Mental Patient: Sterilisation) [1990] 2 AC and Airedale NHS Trust v Bland [1993] AC 789. [read post]
15 Jun 2017, 1:19 pm by Lyle Denniston
(Photo credits: Fred Schilling, Collection of the Supreme Court of the United States) Recent Stories on Constitution Daily Podcast: Loving v. [read post]
29 Jul 2015, 3:26 am by Matrix Legal Information Team
Lady Hale set out the terms of the reference to the court and stated in the view of the court, the principled solution to the case would be to treat the care component of DLA as an invalidity benefit for the purpose of the Council Regulation (EC) No 1408/71. [read post]
5 May 2014, 1:14 pm by Francisco Macías
:  GPO, United States Commission of Civil Rights, 1970. [read post]
19 May 2020, 9:01 pm by Sherry F. Colb
On May 11, the Supreme Court held oral argument in Our Lady of Guadalupe School v. [read post]
27 Oct 2014, 7:48 am by Katharine Alexander, Olswang LLP
Lady Justice Arden gave the lead judgment, with which there was unanimous judicial consent. [read post]
10 Jul 2017, 2:46 am by ASAD KHAN
As demonstrated by Mamatkulov v Turkey (2005) 41 EHRR 25, DFAL’s criterion of serious irreversible harm shows some intersection with the ECtHR’s application of rule 39 relief. [read post]
26 Nov 2014, 5:22 am by Alison Macdonald, Matrix
In R v Gul [2013] UKSC 64, an appeal concerning other aspects of the anti-terrorism regime, the Court stated that “detention of the kind provided for in the Schedule represents the possibility of serious invasions of personal liberty”: [64]. [read post]
30 Jan 2012, 4:29 am by Laura Sandwell, Matrix.
Starting on Monday 30 January  2012 are the appeals of PP v Secretary of State for the Home Department, (formerly VV [Jordan]), PP v Secretary of State for the Home Department, W & BB v Secretary of State for the Home Department and Z, G, U & Y v Secretary of State for the Home Department, scheduled for 1.5 days to be heard by Lords Phillips, Brown, Kerr, Dyson and Wilson. [read post]