Search for: "Lang v. State" Results 201 - 220 of 790
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
22 Oct 2019, 9:09 am by George Basharis
Case date: 20 September 2019 Case number: No. 18-2388 Court: United States Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit A full summary of this case has been published on Kluwer IP Law. [read post]
28 Dec 2019, 2:15 am by Thomas Long
Case date: 05 December 2019 Case number: No. 18-1363 Court: United States Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit A full summary of this case has been published on Kluwer IP Law. [read post]
25 Nov 2019, 2:34 am by Cheryl Beise
” Judge Dyk would hear the decisions on the merits, rather than vacate them for a new hearing before a new panel below (BedGear, LLC v. [read post]
Case date: 26 June 2020 Case number: No. 19-1935 Court: United States Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit A full summary of this case has been published on Kluwer IP Law. [read post]
5 Apr 2019, 3:05 am by Brian Cordery
ZyXEL stated in its pleadings that it was willing to take a licence on RAND terms. [read post]
7 Aug 2024, 4:42 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
“Although the facts pleaded are presumed to be true and are to be accorded every favorable inference, bare legal conclusions as well as factual claims flatly contradicted by the record are not entitled to any such consideration” (Garendean Realty Owner, LLC v Lang, 175 AD3d 653, 653 [internal quotation marks omitted]). [read post]
17 Nov 2010, 2:10 am by Scott A. McKeown
However, Southwire stated to the PTO that the revised claims, “particularly as amended, are not anticipated or rendered obvious by the cited prior art. [read post]
4 Sep 2023, 8:15 am by Tristan Marot
Russel v Russel stated that situations in which discretion against arbitration should be exercised are ‘few and exceptional. [read post]
8 Jun 2012, 9:30 am by azatty
Fullmer Legal Aid Attorney of the Year Award – Mary V. [read post]
7 Feb 2020, 3:45 am by Tim James-Matthews
Indeed, as recently as R (Lagos) v HM Coroner for the City of London [2013] EWHC 423 (Admin), the Divisional Court (Lang J), after detailed consideration of the authorities, determined that the criminal standard applies in those circumstances. [read post]
30 Dec 2010, 7:28 am by brian
The slim majority itself is deeply fragmented being, in effect, a 2-1-2 mélange ranging from Justices Alito's and Kennedy's wary concurrence, to Justice Thomas' belligerent rejection of Tinker v. [read post]
Meade J has also stated that any decision the court makes on the FRAND royalty amount the iPhone maker must pay would apply worldwide, not just to its UK sales (in line with the UK Supreme Court decision last year in Unwired Planet v Huawei). [read post]