Search for: "Lanham v. Lanham" Results 201 - 220 of 4,397
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
"same" claim was literally false where probiotics had different strains and different profiles
2 May 2023, 7:48 am by Rebecca Tushnet
ExeGi Pharma, LLC v. [read post]
43(B)log - http://tushnet.blogspot.com/
MIAMI BUSINESS LITIGATION: TRADEMARK INFRINGEMENT AND CONSUMER CONFUSION
30 Apr 2023, 5:37 am by Mavrick Law Firm
  Jellibeans, Inc. v. [read post]
Florida Business Litigation Lawyer Blog - https://www.mavricklaw.com/blog/
in a Lanham Act (false advertising) case, presumptions cannot substitute for Article III injury
26 Apr 2023, 10:52 am by Rebecca Tushnet
TocMail, Inc. v. [read post]
43(B)log - http://tushnet.blogspot.com/
using competitor's images in comparative advertising is fair use even when appearance isn't being compared
26 Apr 2023, 10:48 am by Rebecca Tushnet
 I Dig Texas, LLC v. [read post]
43(B)log - http://tushnet.blogspot.com/
no disgorgement under state law when false advertising wasn't shown to result in sales
25 Apr 2023, 11:26 am by Rebecca Tushnet
Republic Technologies (NA), LLC v. [read post]
43(B)log - http://tushnet.blogspot.com/
SCOTUS Takes on Jack Daniels’ First Amendment Parody Case
24 Apr 2023, 10:20 am by DONALD SCARINCI
That’s a text that takes precedence over the Lanham Act and you said there are no constitutional issues. [read post]
Constitutional Law Reporter - https://constitutionallawreporter.com/
paying a referral fee is a consumer injury, not a competitor injury, for Lanham Act standing purposes
20 Apr 2023, 7:17 am by Rebecca Tushnet
Lewis v. [read post]
43(B)log - http://tushnet.blogspot.com/
Press release touting preliminary injunction can found false advertising counterclaims
18 Apr 2023, 5:36 am by Rebecca Tushnet
Zest Anchors, LLC v. [read post]
43(B)log - http://tushnet.blogspot.com/
timeshare exit firm wins fee award where plaintiff failed to show key elements of claim
17 Apr 2023, 5:34 am by Rebecca Tushnet
Club Exploria, LLC v. [read post]
43(B)log - http://tushnet.blogspot.com/
Agency liability theory satisfies "commercial advertising or promotion" requirement of promoting one's own products/services
17 Apr 2023, 5:33 am by Rebecca Tushnet
Ariix, LLC v. [read post]
43(B)log - http://tushnet.blogspot.com/
The Case of the Imaginary Yacht: Is ChatGPT the Future of Legal Research?
3 Apr 2023, 1:31 pm by Holly
In the Board’s precedential decision in The Clorox Company v. [read post]
Dunlap Bennett & Ludwig Blog - https://www.dbllawyers.com/blog/
The First Amendment Limits Trademark Rights, But How?–Jack Daniel’s v. Bad Spaniels (Guest Blog Post)
3 Apr 2023, 6:43 am by Eric Goldman
It is clear after Matal v. [read post]
Technology & Marketing Law Blog - http://blog.ericgoldman.org/
(c) ownership claim allows both (c) and Lanham Act claims on motion to dismiss
31 Mar 2023, 1:22 pm by Rebecca Tushnet
Estate of Henry Joseph Darger v. [read post]
43(B)log - http://tushnet.blogspot.com/
Justices mull the “focus” of federal trademark statute in extraterritorial case
28 Mar 2023, 9:35 am by Minyao Wang
In 1952, the court held in Steele v. [read post]
SCOTUSblog - http://www.scotusblog.com/
Jack Daniels Finally Has its Day Before the Supreme Court
27 Mar 2023, 1:38 pm by Felicia Boyd (US)
See Rogers v. [read post]
The Brand Protection Blog - http://www.thebrandprotectionblog.com/
Jack Daniels Finally Has its Day Before the Supreme Court
27 Mar 2023, 1:38 pm by Felicia Boyd (US)
See Rogers v. [read post]
The Brand Protection Blog - http://www.thebrandprotectionblog.com
Third Circuit follows Second in protecting medical journals against trade libel claims
27 Mar 2023, 10:33 am by Rebecca Tushnet
Co. v. [read post]
43(B)log - http://tushnet.blogspot.com/
[Eugene Volokh] Third Circuit Rejects Pacira Biosciences' Trade Libel Claim Over Article in Leading Medical Journal About EXPAREL
27 Mar 2023, 6:05 am by Eugene Volokh
From Friday's Third Circuit decision in Pacira Biosciences, Inc. v. [read post]
The Volokh Conspiracy - http://www.volokh.com/
The Difference Between a Bad Joke and Not a Joke
27 Mar 2023, 4:00 am by Michael C. Dorf
For example, in Campbell v. [read post]
Dorf on Law - http://www.dorfonlaw.org/
Trademark case: Pocket Plus, LLC v. Pike Brands, LLC, USA
24 Mar 2023, 5:42 am by Robert B. Barnett (Wolters Kluwer Legal & Regulatory US)
The appellate court also affirmed the lower court’s grant of attorney fees to the defendant Running Buddy, agreeing with the lower court both that this case qualified as an exceptional case under the Lanham Act and that Running Buddy was entitled only to one-fourth of its fee request (Pocket Plus, LLC v. [read post]
KluwerTrademarkBlog - http://trademarkblog.kluweriplaw.com/