Search for: "Law v. United States Department of Agriculture"
Results 201 - 220
of 681
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
12 Dec 2019, 5:45 am
Illinois Department of Revenue (1967) and Quill Corp. v. [read post]
3 Dec 2019, 10:16 pm
Brief of the United States (Department of Justice and the Federal Trade Commission), in support of Chamber of Commerce of the United States of America and Rasier, LLC, v. [read post]
18 Nov 2019, 12:55 pm
The subcommittee will hear testimony from Kip Tom, the U.S. representative to the U.N. agencies for food and agriculture; Jonathan Moore, the principal deputy assistant secretary of state for international affairs; Scott Busby, the deputy assistant secretary of state for democracy, human rights and labor; and three non-government witnesses. [read post]
10 Nov 2019, 2:54 pm
” Morton v. [read post]
6 Nov 2019, 7:59 am
Cripps Pink is a sweet, crisp and crunchy variety of apple that was developed by Mr John Cripps (‘the breeder’), a researcher in the Plant Industries division of the Department of Agriculture and Food Western Australia (‘the Department’), by crossing Golden Delicious and Lady Williams varieties. [read post]
5 Nov 2019, 9:05 pm
For example, in United States v. [read post]
1 Nov 2019, 9:01 am
Targeted infrastructure funding is partly addressed by a Senate appropriations bill that devotes $690 million in fiscal year (FY) 2020 funding for the United States Department of Agriculture (USDA) Rural Utilities Service (RUS) broadband loan and grant programs (presumably including the ReConnect program). [read post]
29 Oct 2019, 10:32 am
United States (1978), the U.S. [read post]
23 Oct 2019, 11:14 am
By expanding the scope of the crime of perjury, AB 1291 imposes a state-mandated local program and authorizes the Bureau of Cannabis Control, the Department of Food and Agriculture, and the State Department of Public Health to revoke or suspend a license for a violation of these requirements. [read post]
16 Oct 2019, 6:59 am
The Supreme Court has decided exactly one case involving the privilege, and even that decision—in the Watergate tapes case, United States v. [read post]
7 Oct 2019, 9:33 am
Congress has reportedly authorized $550 million in the United States Department of Agriculture (USDA) ReConnect funding in 2019 (as compared to $600 million in 2018). [read post]
23 Sep 2019, 5:08 am
Contrast that revolution with the Agricultural Revolution. [read post]
18 Sep 2019, 10:02 am
See Daubert v. [read post]
18 Sep 2019, 10:02 am
See Daubert v. [read post]
17 Sep 2019, 9:01 am
While prospects for significant federal spending on a new broadband program remain in limbo, Congress has allocated further funding to the United States Department of Agriculture (“USDA”) ReConnect funding for 2020 (item below). [read post]
14 Sep 2019, 7:38 am
State Department including career official resignations due to disagreements with Trump administration policies. [read post]
12 Sep 2019, 10:17 am
The United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit recently allowed a “patronage capital” lawsuit to continue in federal court after deciding federal loan conditions and requirements may preempt state laws.[1] One of the agencies within the United States Department of Agriculture is the Rural Utilities Service (RUS). [read post]
12 Sep 2019, 10:17 am
The United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit recently allowed a “patronage capital” lawsuit to continue in federal court after deciding federal loan conditions and requirements may preempt state laws.[1] One of the agencies within the United States Department of Agriculture is the Rural Utilities Service (RUS). [read post]
7 Sep 2019, 7:00 am
Click on the text in color to access the complete audits and reports.Department of Agriculture and Markets: Oversight of Weights and Measures Programs (Follow-Up) (2019-F-11)An initial report, issued in December 2017, identified systemic issues with the quality of the data the department relies on to administer the state’s weights and measures program. [read post]
26 Aug 2019, 8:02 am
JUDICIAL: Includes Checkoff Program Humane Society of the United States, et al., Appellees/Cross-Appellants v. [read post]
