Search for: "Lax v. State" Results 201 - 220 of 523
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
25 Apr 2016, 4:21 pm by Eugene Volokh
Likewise, 28% of online adults in the United States use LinkedIn, another website covered by § 14-202.5. [read post]
24 Apr 2016, 9:39 am by Guest Blogger
Indeed, reliance on intermediate scrutiny to do the work of the more traditional tests is manifest in such cases as United States v. [read post]
19 Apr 2016, 9:30 pm by Richard L. Hasen
The loosening of campaign finance regulation began with the Supreme Court’s controversial 2010 decision in Citizens United v. [read post]
21 Mar 2016, 9:16 am by Adam Levitin
 The result was that credit card issuers moved to states with low or no usury laws, such as Delaware and South Dakota, and then exported the lax regulation to other jurisdictions. [read post]
22 Feb 2016, 7:18 am by Podhurst Orseck
The high court in in 2012 dismissed as “improvidently granted review” First American v. [read post]
20 Jan 2016, 8:52 am by Abbott & Kindermann
Resources Code, § 21050 et seq.) to a state agency’s proprietary acts with respect to a state-owned and funded rail line or is CEQA not preempted in such circumstances under the market participant doctrine (see Town of Atherton v. [read post]