Search for: "Lee v. Baker"
Results 201 - 220
of 266
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
9 Aug 2010, 2:25 pm
* The latest article addressing the Trademark Use in Commerce debate: Lee Ann W. [read post]
6 Aug 2010, 3:48 am
Baker, 229 P.3d 650 (Utah 2010) (same); State v. [read post]
26 Jul 2010, 9:08 am
– Trading Markets.com, July 21, 2010 Consistent with Section 122 of the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act of 1980, as amended (“CERCLA”), 42 U.S.C. 9622(d), and 28 CFR 50.7, notice is hereby given that on July 16, 2010, the United States lodged a Consent Decree with 163 defendants (each of which is identified in the proposed Decree) in United States of America v. [read post]
8 Jul 2010, 7:22 am
(Review of Ian Bremmer, The End of the Free Market: Who Wins the War Between States and Corporations? [read post]
1 Jul 2010, 8:21 am
The ruling in Warren Lee Hill, Jr. v. [read post]
3 Jun 2010, 7:36 pm
In the denouement, Exxon Shipping v. [read post]
25 May 2010, 4:33 pm
” State v. [read post]
15 May 2010, 9:34 am
Kaui Jochanan Amsterdam v. [read post]
26 Apr 2010, 1:30 pm
Rasul v. [read post]
17 Apr 2010, 11:03 am
No. 140 (S.C.); Lee v. [read post]
5 Apr 2010, 7:09 pm
The Baker v. [read post]
23 Mar 2010, 8:00 am
On the one hand, Bush v. [read post]
23 Mar 2010, 1:11 am
Baker Hostetler Partners Take Up States' Challenge of Health Care Overhaul The National Law Journal Baker Hostetler partners David Rivkin Jr. and Lee Casey have signed on as outside counsel to several state attorneys general who want the national health care legislation overturned in court. [read post]
4 Mar 2010, 8:49 pm
Edwin Baker, and Cass Sunstein, among many others, war with modern liberty. [read post]
2 Mar 2010, 8:37 am
by Tracey Knutson A Review of the Space Development Promotion Act of the Republic of Korea by Yoon Lee China’s ASAT Test: A Demonstrated Need for Legal Reform by K.K. [read post]
26 Feb 2010, 5:09 am
” Marquart v. [read post]
15 Feb 2010, 6:40 am
Baker Concrete Constr., Inc., 487 F.3d 1340, 1344 (11th Cir.2007)). [read post]
12 Feb 2010, 11:50 am
Allen, Jacob Hazelton, Douglas V. [read post]
31 Jan 2010, 10:07 pm
So I don't see the Progressives as principled supporters of judicial restraint, but as consistent supporters of government regulation of virtually all aspects of human life, from limiting how many hours a baker could work, to banning private schools, to segregating housing [Progressive law review commentary was especially hostile to Buchanan v. [read post]
25 Jan 2010, 3:51 am
Thermo-Ply (PATracer) Honeywell – Patentee appeals finding of patent invalidity under on-sale bar provisions of § 102(b): Honeywell v Nikon (PATracer) Nalco – Nalco appeals from grant of preliminary injunction against it from infringement patent directed to method of removing or transferring metals and/or amines from crude oil: Baker Hughes v Nalco (PATracer) Nutriset - Access to food now an IP issue? [read post]
