Search for: "Lee v. Doe et al"
Results 201 - 220
of 323
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
2 Nov 2021, 8:26 pm
Rosanna Smart et al., The Science of Gun Policy: A Critical Synthesis of Research Evidence on the Effects of Gun Policies in the United States. [read post]
30 Oct 2013, 10:57 am
Faigman, et al., Modern Scientific Evidence: Standards, Statistics, and Research Methods v (2008 student ed.). [read post]
21 Oct 2008, 6:30 pm
Harp, et al (NFP) - Issues. [read post]
11 Sep 2019, 6:30 am
Fallon, Jr., et al., Hart and Wechsler’s the Federal Courts and the Federal System (2015); see also Richard H. [read post]
11 Jul 2012, 8:43 am
Some of the access routes he said, could be a little bit fairer — v good point, and the social capital literature (Sommerlad et al, eg) certainly evidences this. [read post]
12 Jul 2012, 7:30 am
Case No.: 6:07-cv-839-Orl-35-KRS SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, et. al., Respondents. [read post]
28 Jan 2011, 1:04 pm
[et al.]. [read post]
11 Sep 2017, 10:00 pm
Biol.Chem., Vol. 268, No. 5, pages 3444 to 3449, February 1993;(2): Se-Jin Lee, Proc.Natl.Acad.Sci.USA, Vol. 88, pages 4250 to 4254, May 1991;(3): Se-Jin Lee, Mol.Endocrinol., Vol. 4, No. 7, pages 1034 to 1040, 1990;(4): Jinwen Dong et al., Nature, Vol. 383, pages 531 to 536, 10 October 1996;Exh.E: Hayashi, M. et al., Endocrinology, Vol. 140, No. 3, pages 1236 to 1244, 1999.V. [read post]
12 Dec 2016, 6:12 am
Filburn et al were left untouched.) [read post]
25 Jan 2010, 3:51 am
(GRAY On Claims) District Court E D Louisiana: Prior License of asserted patent does not bar imposition of permanent injunction: Innovention Toys, LLC v MGA Entertainment, Inc. et al(Docket Report) District Court N D California: Delay of five to seven years does not create undue prejudice sufficient to deny stay pending reexam: Spectros Corp v Thermo Fisher Scientific, Inc (Docket Report) BPAI: Reissue cannot merely add new dependent claims… [read post]
10 Apr 2014, 4:00 am
Committee for Justice and Liberty et al v National Energy Board et al, [1978] 1 SCR 369 at 394 [National Energy Board]. [read post]
24 Apr 2020, 11:33 am
In another, Logan Alters, et al. v. [read post]
29 Aug 2022, 9:05 pm
There have also been reports that the FTC is actively investigating violations of past merger consent decrees, potentially with the aim of unwinding the previously cleared merger.15 In this vein, the agencies have been issuing “close at your own risk” letters to merging parties in non-challenged and non-remedy transactions that remind the parties that the agencies retain the authority to challenge mergers after they have closed and that expiration of an HSR waiting period… [read post]
5 Jul 2009, 5:01 pm
Tinker et al. v. [read post]
25 Jul 2018, 11:05 am
Fannie Mae et al., 712 F.3d 572 (D.C. [read post]
23 May 2022, 6:00 am
Co. et al., 272 Ga. 583, 584 (2000). [read post]
11 Nov 2022, 2:46 pm
Jan. 5, 2022). [4] Daubert v. [read post]
22 Jul 2010, 6:38 am
There is the famous Exxon case, Exxon Corp. v. [read post]
24 Sep 2011, 3:58 am
http://j.st/cqz Father M, et al. v. [read post]
13 Dec 2011, 1:39 am
The Issues on Appeal Here is the summary of the issues presented in this round from the Judiciary web site: Defendants-Appellants/Cross-Appellees James Sherman et al. [read post]
