Search for: "Lee v. Jones" Results 201 - 220 of 432
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
12 Jun 2014, 12:00 am by My name
  [iii]Jaeah Lee, Its not just about hobby lobby: These 71Companies Don’t Want To Cover Your Birth Control Either, Mother Jones, Apr. 2, 2014,http://www.motherjones.com/politics/2014/04/hobby-lobby-sebelius-contraceptive-for-profit-lawsuits   [iv]Supra, note i. [read post]
4 Apr 2014, 2:46 pm by Reproductive Rights
Mother Jones: It's Not Just Hobby Lobby: These 71 Companies Don't Want to Cover Your Birth Control Either, by Jaeah Lee: Last week, the Supreme Court heard oral arguments in Sebelius v. [read post]
21 Mar 2014, 8:52 pm by firemarkVA
  ‘Innocence of Muslims’ Actress Scores Huge Victory at Appeals Court Cindy Lee Garcia v. [read post]
12 Mar 2014, 4:39 pm by Marty Lederman
Board of Equalization of California in 1990, involving an array of legislation ranging from child protection laws (Prince), to anti-discrimination laws (Piggie Park, Bob Jones), to wage and hour laws (Tony & Susan Alamo Foundation), to Sunday closing laws (Braunfeld and related cases), to tax requirements (Lee, Covenant Community Church v. [read post]
19 Jan 2014, 4:02 pm by INFORRM
”, Phil Lee, Field Fisher Waterhouse Privacy and Information Law Blog. [read post]
13 Jan 2014, 4:05 am by Howard Friedman
Proia, Freeing the Prop 8 Tape: Perry v. [read post]
5 Dec 2013, 1:52 pm by Eugene Volokh
Gillette has since been cited (for instance, by Bob Jones Univ. v. [read post]
14 Nov 2013, 5:11 pm by Simon Chester
Citizens have a duty to report crimes to law enforcement officers: see Wing Lee v. [read post]
11 Nov 2013, 8:05 pm by Walter Olson
High times at the Federal Mediation and Conciliation Service [Luke Rosiak, Examiner via Jim Harper, Cato] 6th Circuit: In ruling company’s suit against union to be unfair labor practice, NLRB breezed past First Amendment issues [NLRB v. [read post]
4 Nov 2013, 3:00 am by John Day
Jones, 164 S.W.2d 823 (Tenn. 1942) the law required the filing of a sworn, detailed statement of campaign expenses not more than ten but no less than five days before an election. [read post]
16 Sep 2013, 4:19 pm by Stephen Bilkis
As a general proposition, expert testimony is properly admitted to help lay jurors understand matters that are not ordinarily within their understanding akin to People v Brown and People v Lee. [read post]
2 Aug 2013, 9:35 am by Lorene Park
Majority view emerging Adopting a similar view, a federal district court in Minnesota dismissed an oil recovery company’s CFAA claim against a former employee who downloaded its customer information, presumably to be shared with her inlaws’ newly formed company (Lube-Tech Liquid Recycling, Inc v Lee’s Oil Service, LLC, June 3, 2013). [read post]
5 Jul 2013, 11:00 am by Eric
This is another thedirty case, and it's another puzzling Section 230 loss like the Jones v. [read post]