Search for: "Liability and Insurers for Each Defendant, Defendant's" Results 201 - 220 of 3,386
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
18 Jan 2011, 8:34 am by Carolyn Moskowitz
When massive frauds like this (allegedly) occur, directors and officers liability insurance policies may not cover the damages. [read post]
9 Jan 2013, 12:00 am by Kevin LaCroix
  With respect to the FDIC D&O cases still pending, the insured deposit losses paid by the FDIC in each case generally far outstrip the available D&O insurance proceeds. [read post]
6 Jun 2020, 12:43 pm by Jon L. Gelman
The NJ Supreme Court decided an asbestos product liability case that mandates strict liability against manufacturers or distributors of products that contain asbestos-fiber. [read post]
23 May 2014, 2:03 pm
Practice Tip #3: The claims of this case appear calculated to trigger the "advertising injury" clause of many general business liability insurance policies. [read post]
16 Dec 2011, 1:11 pm by Goldberg Segalla LLP
LEXIS 141884 (Dec. 9, 2011) Liability for underlying asbestos claim alleged against an insured must be prorated according to the time that each defendant insurer provided coverage during the period in which the injury-in-fact occurred the U.S. [read post]
1 Mar 2016, 7:29 am by Earl Drott
Typically, both the plaintiff and the defendant are represented by counsel when the plaintiff’s evidence of each of these elements is given, but this is not always so. [read post]
20 May 2018, 8:21 am by The Ansara Law Firm
Approximately 4.5 million dog bites are reported each year, with 1 in 5 of those bites becoming infected (according to the CDC), 28,000 requiring reconstructive surgery (according to the American Society of Plastic Surgeons) and accounting for one-third – or $700 million – of all homeowner insurance liability payouts (per the Insurance Information Institute). [read post]
3 Dec 2007, 7:30 am
  The Court of Appeals instead found that liability for reimbursement was subject to allocation based on the benefit conferred upon each insured, with the burden of proof on the issue resting on the insurer.A full copy of the court's opinion is available here. [read post]
6 Jun 2013, 10:18 am by Daniel E. Cummins
   According to the Opinion, after the underlying claim by the injured party was settled by the payment of the policy limits, the insured Defendant filed suit against the liability carrier. [read post]
24 Feb 2014, 12:39 pm
Because the TCPA provides for $500 in liquidated damages for each unsolicited faxed advertisement, Unitherm faced more than $37 million in liability for its ill-advised marketing strategy. [read post]
5 Dec 2011, 11:58 am
Defendants and insurers say the trusts should be treated as non-adversarial settlement vehicles. [read post]
5 Oct 2008, 5:20 pm
  As this claim was available as a basis for Boland’s liability to the condominium corporation, the court held that Allianz had a duty to defend the claim. [read post]
24 Jan 2018, 11:46 am by Michael S. Levine
The ruling opens the door under each of the policyholder’s successive liability policies from 2000 to 2008, allowing the policyholder to recover millions of dollars in defense costs. [read post]
24 Jan 2018, 11:46 am by Michael S. Levine
The ruling opens the door under each of the policyholder’s successive liability policies from 2000 to 2008, allowing the policyholder to recover millions of dollars in defense costs. [read post]
28 Jul 2014, 4:03 am by John Day
Jones had assumed duties beyond those of an ordinary insurance agent thereby obligating him to select appropriate liability insurance and limits. [read post]
If the other party decides (for whatever reason) to sue, then your insurer will provide you with an attorney free of charge under the 'duty to defend' in accordance with your insurance contract with them.The second type of coverage listed is typically 'Liability Property Damage'. [read post]
11 Jun 2008, 8:44 am
Markel International Insurance Co Ltd v Surety Guarantee Consultants Ltd & others; (1) QBE Insurance (Europe) Ltd (2) Amalfi Underwriting Ltd v Surety Guarantee Consultants Ltd & others [2008] EWHC 1135 (Comm) concerned a joint trial of two separate but similar cases brought by each of Markel and QBE, together with Amalfi, in which they alleged that the Defendants had defrauded them in connection with the writing of surety bonds between January… [read post]