Search for: "Little v. Jacobs" Results 201 - 220 of 459
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
22 Oct 2015, 8:00 pm by John Ehrett
Little Sisters of the Poor Home for the Aged v. [read post]
20 Oct 2015, 3:24 pm
It was very often far cheaper and easier, and also much quicker, to pay infringers to help change their products, brands, business cards and so on than to go to court and get a judgment – and they sometimes earned a little kudos by so doing. [read post]
16 Oct 2015, 8:20 am by Ilya Somin
Cooke argues that a constitutional amendment to overturn the Supreme Court’s widely despised 2005 ruling in Kelo v. [read post]
16 Oct 2015, 7:08 am by John Elwood
Next up: two-time relist Jacobs v. [read post]
2 Oct 2015, 5:14 am by Amy Howe
  Lyle Denniston covered the orders for this blog, while at PrawfsBlawg Howard Wasserman discusses the grant in Bank Markazi v. [read post]
25 Sep 2015, 6:43 am
 You can, if you are interested, read a little about how the charge arose in the news stories you can find here, here and here. [read post]
3 Aug 2015, 5:10 am
No, justenjoying a drop of H2OLast week a judgment from Sir Robin Jacob plopped into Merpel's inbox which caused more than a slight tremor of her whiskers. [read post]
21 Jul 2015, 10:22 am by Second Circuit Civil Rights Blog
The named plaintiffs were hired as interns and did a little bit of this and a little bit of that for the company, i.e., handling publicity, taking out the trash, photocopying, making deliveries, and so on. [read post]
30 Jun 2015, 4:13 am by Rebecca Tushnet
Session 3:  The Consumer in Different Trade Mark ContextsDo the questions that we have looked at in the first two sessions vary in different trademark and adjacent contexts? [read post]
24 Jun 2015, 4:25 pm by Andy
Here the quoted cases were White v Samsung, Wendt v Host International and Douglas v Mattel. [read post]
23 Jun 2015, 7:31 am by Amy Howe
  Rory Little covered the decision for this blog, with other coverage coming from Tony Mauro (who also covers yesterday’s decision in Kingsley v. [read post]