Search for: "Livingston v. State"
Results 201 - 220
of 544
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
17 May 2016, 6:39 am
The Court of Appeals (Carney, Livingston and Pooler) says "an informational disclosure law . . . [read post]
4 May 2016, 1:15 pm
State v. [read post]
4 May 2016, 1:15 pm
State v. [read post]
15 Apr 2016, 3:00 am
Supreme Court will hear oral arguments in Bernard v. [read post]
15 Apr 2016, 3:00 am
Supreme Court will hear oral arguments in Bernard v. [read post]
15 Mar 2016, 8:55 am
Inc. v. [read post]
2 Mar 2016, 7:39 am
" These claims are hard to win, but they are winnable.The case is Stephenson v. [read post]
8 Feb 2016, 3:52 am
While the state argues that this case cannot be filed in federal court, the Court of Appeals (Kearse, Livingston and Pooler) says that "the collateral order doctrine has been held not applicable to permit immediate appeal of decisions denying motions to dismiss on the ground that plaintiffs' claims should be adjudicated in a different forum. [read post]
18 Jan 2016, 11:12 pm
Bushrod is known for, among other things, deciding Corfield v. [read post]
8 Jan 2016, 11:23 am
Blake v. [read post]
7 Jan 2016, 1:33 pm
See Oachs v. [read post]
23 Nov 2015, 12:34 pm
The Court of Appeals rejects the habeas petition, and that's probably the end of the line for this guy.The case is Chrysler v. [read post]
2 Nov 2015, 6:27 am
The majority (Winter and Livingston) is not buying it. [read post]
23 Oct 2015, 7:32 am
On September 15, 2015, the Court of Appeals released a published opinion in McConchie v Voight (Docket No. 326651) finding the actions of the Livingston Circuit Court and a Friend of the Court Referee in Livingston acted "grossly improper" in their decision-making and procedures in a custody case. [read post]
1 Oct 2015, 1:35 pm
United States, or its decision in United States v. [read post]
18 Sep 2015, 9:50 pm
The lawyers also contended that the Second Circuit ruling contradicts the Supreme Court’s 2007 decision in Leegin Creative Leather Products Inc. v. [read post]
28 Aug 2015, 9:36 am
” State v. [read post]
26 Aug 2015, 6:35 am
The case is Gortat v. [read post]
31 May 2015, 8:51 am
It took the Court of Appeals 2.5 years to reach a decision in this case, holding in a 2-1 vote that the State of New York can regulate this speech.The case is Children First Foundation v. [read post]
28 May 2015, 6:46 am
What fascinates me is how the plaintiff's credibility was ripped apart at trial but he still won the case.The case is Wiercinski v. [read post]
