Search for: "Lockheed Martin Corp" Results 201 - 220 of 295
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
15 Oct 2007, 6:00 am
Lockheed Martin Corp. (2003) 29 Cal.4th 1134, 1148 (Korea Supply Co.); Kraus v. [read post]
31 Mar 2010, 11:55 pm by Ben Vernia
Lockheed Martin Corp., 558 F.3d 1161 (10th Cir. 2009), the Court first rejected the whistleblower’s arguments that the release was ineffective without the government’s consent, and that he did not possess a legally cognizable claim subject to the release’s terms. [read post]
1 Oct 2007, 4:50 am
U.S. 4th Circuit Court of Appeals, September 27, 2007In Re: Lockheed Martin Corp., No. 06-1344In case involving insurance coverage dispute and the right to a jury trial in an admiralty case, petition for writ of mandamus challenging order striking petitioner's request for a jury trial after it asserted compulsory counterclaims is granted as the Seventh Amendment was implicated here and petitioner was entitled to a jury trial. [read post]
25 Jul 2012, 7:50 am by Sonya Hubbard
He’s been with the company since 2001, when he arrived after forging a 22-year career with Lockheed Martin Corp. [read post]
28 Apr 2011, 2:39 pm
§ 112, ¶ 6; see also Lockheed Martin Corp. v Space Sys. [read post]
27 Jan 2010, 6:59 am by randal shaheen
Lockheed Martin Corp., Pom “seeks to recover ‘nonrestitutional disgorgement of profits’ that are nothing more than a ‘contingent expectancy of a payment from a third party’ -- in this case, consumers. [read post]
5 Oct 2010, 5:15 am by Sean Wajert
Lockheed Martin Corp., 531 U.S. 497, 504 (2001). [read post]
31 Jul 2015, 11:06 am by Quinta Jurecic , Staley Smith
Marine Corps Commandant General Joseph Dunford announced that an initial squadron of 10 Lockheed Martin Corp F-35B fighter jets are ready for combat, Reuters reveals. [read post]
29 May 2011, 12:01 pm
Lockheed Martin Corp., 29 Cal. 4th 1134, 1149 (2003)). [read post]
3 Apr 2010, 3:30 pm
The Inwood test applies to a service providers, like eBay, if he or she exercises sufficient control over the infringing conduct (Lockheed Martin Corp v Network Solutions (1999) and Polymer II (1994)). [read post]
23 May 2008, 1:30 am
Lockheed Martin Corp., the District Court noted that PrivateEyes would need to satisfy the following elements in order to prevail: “(1) an economic relationship between the plaintiff and some third party, with the probability of future economic benefit to the plaintiff; (2) the defendant’s knowledge of the relationship; (3) intentional acts on the part of the defendant designed to disrupt the relationship; (4) actual disruption of the relationship; and… [read post]
23 Mar 2008, 9:03 am
Lockheed Martin   Eastern District of Tennessee at Knoxville 08a0154n.062008/03/18 USA v. [read post]
4 Nov 2020, 9:21 am by Abby Lemert, Eleanor Runde
Lockheed Martin Corp., Raytheon Technologies Corp. and the defense unit of Boeing Co. may face Chinese sanctions if the U.S. [read post]