Search for: "Long v. Secretary, Department of Corrections"
Results 201 - 220
of 388
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
22 Sep 2017, 4:00 am
United States, Cox v. [read post]
24 Jul 2017, 11:36 am
But when the CIA, State Department and FBI got wind of the plan to conduct operations [read post]
12 Jul 2017, 3:50 am
Department of Justice reports over 4,000 ransomware attacks occur daily. [read post]
2 Jul 2017, 4:03 pm
On the same day Macfarlane LJ refused permission to appeal in the long running application in the case of Lokhova v Tymula. [read post]
30 May 2017, 3:26 am
Freedom of Information The judgement in the case of Department of Health v Information Commissioner & Lewis [2017] EWCA Civ 374) has been published. [read post]
27 May 2017, 1:56 pm
Reading the Fourth Circuit’s en banc opinion in International Refugee Assistance Project v. [read post]
19 May 2017, 9:13 am
As Quinta and I explained: Under United States v. [read post]
16 May 2017, 8:03 am
Mandel (1972), or Kerry v. [read post]
9 May 2017, 4:59 am
Yesterday afternoon, the Fourth Circuit, sitting en banc, heard two hours of argument in IRAP v. [read post]
3 May 2017, 5:02 am
Here, for instance, is a letter that led the court in Correctional Medical Care, Inc. v. [read post]
26 Mar 2017, 6:00 am
On Friday, the Justice Department filed a particularly interesting brief in International Refugee Assistance Project v. [read post]
15 Mar 2017, 4:28 pm
Trucios-Haynes observed in the Georgetown Immigration Law Journal that applying the Supreme Court’s Establishment Clause jurisprudence to long-standing immigration laws “is particularly awkward. [read post]
12 Mar 2017, 5:56 pm
If the State Department issues the mother-in-law a visa, promptly, this plaintiff’s claim becomes moot and should be dismissed. [read post]
7 Mar 2017, 6:53 pm
The above recitals are true and correct and incorporated herein as though fully set forth below. [read post]
7 Mar 2017, 6:53 pm
The above recitals are true and correct and incorporated herein as though fully set forth below. [read post]
3 Mar 2017, 9:30 am
And the disruption in our expectations of the presidency, and our civic and legal responses to it will, we suspect, have a very long tail. [read post]
27 Feb 2017, 9:01 pm
This is particularly so given the Supreme Court’s holding in 1989 in Price Waterhouse v. [read post]
8 Feb 2017, 10:26 am
If lawyers at the State Department decide that Wittes and McCants are correct and the Brotherhood just doesn’t satisfy the statutory criteria for designation as an FTO, as the New York Times reported last night they may now believe, could President Trump’s Treasury still take action against the group? [read post]
1 Feb 2017, 9:00 pm
The Tenure in Office Act was repealed in 1887, and in the case of Myers v. [read post]
10 Jan 2017, 12:35 pm
In Porter v. [read post]
