Search for: "Lord v. State -"
Results 201 - 220
of 4,026
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
20 Sep 2011, 10:27 am
Judgments were also published in non-anyonmised form – see Doncaster v Haigh and Doncaster v Watson. [read post]
5 Jun 2009, 2:09 am
Lord Justice Aiken, agreeing that the appeal should be dismissed stated ” As Waller LJ has stated, S owed the appellant a duty of care. [read post]
27 Mar 2019, 5:28 am
Brian Cordery and Claire Phipps-JonesThe UK Supreme Court today handed down its decision in Actavis v ICOS. [read post]
9 Feb 2015, 2:47 pm
I am thinking here of Spencer v Taylor (which we analysed here), Charalambous v Ng, and now Edwards v Kumarasamy. [read post]
28 Feb 2012, 7:46 am
Greer and Day v. [read post]
7 Apr 2016, 8:35 am
ZM v Secretary of State for the Home Department; HA (Iraq) v Secretary of State for the Home Department, heard 12-14 January 2016. [read post]
12 Mar 2015, 8:16 am
The previous leading authority on “white list” designation was R (Javed) v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2001] EWCA Civ 789. [read post]
15 Apr 2014, 9:52 am
The post Case Comment: R (Reilly & Anor) v Secretary of State for Work and Pensions appeared first on UKSCBlog. [read post]
6 Mar 2011, 12:29 pm
From Monday 7 to Wednesday 9 March 2011, Lords Phillips and Walker, Lady Hale, and Lords Mance and Collins will hear Lucasfilm Limited and others v Ainsworth and another. [read post]
19 Jan 2012, 10:09 am
In a unanimous ruling the Court held that the UK could not lawfully deport Abu Qatada to his native Jordan, overturning the House of Lords (who had unanimously come to the opposite conclusion in RB (Algeria) v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2009] UKHL 10, [2010] 2 AC 110).” Full story UK Human Rights Blog, 19th January 2012 Source: www.ukhumanrightsblog.com [read post]
26 Jun 2010, 12:07 pm
In Black v. [read post]
19 Jan 2012, 10:09 am
In a unanimous ruling the Court held that the UK could not lawfully deport Abu Qatada to his native Jordan, overturning the House of Lords (who had unanimously come to the opposite conclusion in RB (Algeria) v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2009] UKHL 10, [2010] 2 AC 110).” Full story UK Human Rights Blog, 19th January 2012 Source: www.ukhumanrightsblog.com [read post]
5 Mar 2021, 12:43 am
On 25 February 2021, the UK Supreme Court heard the appeal in Anwar v The Advocate General (Representing the Secretary of State for Business Energy and Industrial Strategy). [read post]
14 Jul 2017, 11:58 am
The Murr family were the plaintiffs in Murr v. [read post]
8 May 2012, 3:58 am
Starting on Tuesday 8 May 2012 in front of Lords Hope, Walker, Kerr, Clarke and Dyson is the hearing of Phillips v Mulcaire. [read post]
8 Feb 2021, 8:21 am
Despite its ruling, Court of Appeal accepted the basic principle in R (L) v Commissioner of Police for the Metropolis [2009] UKSC 3 (at [45] per Lord Hope) that neither imperative takes precedence over the other. [read post]
27 Aug 2010, 10:13 am
Patel, R (on the application of) v Lord Chancellor [2010] EWHC 2220 (Admin) (27 August 2010) – Read judgment The wife of the purported ringleader of the ’7/7? [read post]
10 Dec 2013, 7:35 am
Lord Wilson stated that he could “countenance somewhat more readily than does Lord Brown” the possibility that refusal to disclose the requested information interfered with art 10. [read post]
29 Dec 2017, 8:00 am
Even so, Lord Carnwath acknowledged that had the CFR been held to apply interesting questions would have arisen under art 21. [read post]
20 Jan 2016, 7:00 am
Of interest to constitutional lawyers, the Court embarked upon a detailed consideration of an earlier decision in Quark Fishing Ltd v UK, App. [read post]
