Search for: "M. M. vs STATE OF FLORIDA" Results 201 - 220 of 274
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
7 Mar 2011, 3:42 am by Marie Louise
Fungoman LLC (Property, intangible) District Court M D Florida: Patentee entitled to permanent injunction despite granting earlier licenses where licensees and infringing party compete: Harris Corporation v. [read post]
19 Feb 2011, 6:55 am by Steve Lombardi
Girl wrestling isn’t real wrestling; if you think I’m wrong then watch every video in this post and by the end if you think I’m wrong write it publicly and call me out; if not then stop talking about coed wrestling: Iowa, Florida, World, Ohio, Texas, California, Washington, New Jersey vs Virginia, Oregon vs New York and in Moscow. 1972 - This is where Iowa Wrestling started and what it’s all about. [read post]
8 Feb 2011, 7:26 am by Joseph C. McDaniel
If he can get them enacted, and Florida rebounds (or at least doesn't need new bailouts), that will provide one sort of template for the other insolvent States. [read post]
10 Jan 2011, 3:20 am by Kelly
Chattem Inc., et. al., (Docket Report) M D Florida: Difficulty determining expiration of patent requires false marking complaint to plead knowledge of expiration with specificity: Herengracht Group LLC v. [read post]
16 Dec 2010, 1:59 am
 When one compares the 1999 and 2010 estimates (76 million vs. 47.8 million illnesses), the immediate response is to ask: Does this mean that food in this country is safer than it was 11 years ago? [read post]
22 Nov 2010, 2:16 am by Kelly
Kappos (IP Spotlight) (Patent Docs) Sham patent reexamination action not available in State Court says CAFC: Lockwood v. [read post]
17 Sep 2010, 5:30 am by Jon Hyman
I’ve already made my votes (which I’m keeping to myself). [read post]
5 Aug 2010, 1:07 pm by James R. Marsh
A town of about 40,000 people, it is the county seat for Luzerne, in the northeast part of the state. [read post]
25 May 2010, 5:48 am by Simon Lester
First off, let me note that I'm focusing here on issues of de facto discrimination, not de jure. [read post]