Search for: "MARTINEZ V. HIGH" Results 201 - 220 of 303
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
23 Apr 2010, 3:19 am by Lisa McElroy
Let’s start with the oral argument in Christian Legal Society v. [read post]
20 May 2019, 9:11 am by MOTP
But if the analysis is restricted to members of the high courts, the ratio shifts further in favor of the Texas Supreme Court& [read post]
10 Jul 2016, 9:30 pm by RegBlog
In another high-profile case, Fisher v. [read post]
6 Mar 2016, 4:18 am by SHG
Martinez-Fuerte, 423 US. 543 (1976), and temporary stops and limited searches for weapons, Terry v. [read post]
13 Jul 2020, 1:40 pm by Shira M. Blank and Joshua A. Stein
This risk is only heightened — particularly for those operating in California — following a slew of recent decisions, including one from the California Court of Appeals just last month in Martinez v. [read post]
12 May 2010, 7:02 pm by Erin Miller
Opinion below (9th Circuit) Petition for certiorari Brief in opposition Petitioner’s reply Amicus brief of the Pacific Legal Foundation Amicus brief of the Bay Planning Coalition and the California Building Industry Association Title: Contreras-Martinez v. [read post]
16 Jun 2010, 8:30 am by Lisa McElroy
Martinez (a case about funding to religious groups at public universities) and Doe v. [read post]
6 Mar 2015, 12:53 pm by MOTP
The Texas high court for civil matters concludes that the Texas law at issue (Section 74.451 of the Texas Civil Practice and Remedies Code), does not squarely fall within the scope of a state law enacted to regulate the business of insurance. [read post]
29 Sep 2010, 10:33 pm
 My remarks were too long to reproduce fully in a blog entry, but I'll nonetheless try to summarize the high points. [read post]
3 May 2012, 5:19 pm by INFORRM
. “Centre of interests” Jaron Lewis, a partner at RPC, where he leads the firm’s media group, updated delegates on online defamation & privacy and began with the Joined Cases C-509/09 and C-161/10 eDate Advertising GmbH v X and Olivier Martinez v MGN Ltd in relation to jurisdiction. [read post]
29 Jul 2019, 7:34 pm by Richard Hunt
The attorneys fees seem high, with five lawyers spending more than 11 hours filing forms, but courts cannot disregard claims that are presented under oath and only look unreasonable. [read post]
2 Jul 2010, 8:24 am by Don Cruse
Institutional Division of the Texas Department of Criminal Justice and Miguel Martinez v. [read post]
20 May 2016, 9:08 am by John Elwood
In 2013, Johnson filed a motion asking the district court to reconsider its previous dismissal based on Martinez v. [read post]
14 Nov 2014, 5:42 am by John Elwood
Mayor and City Council of Baltimore, 13-10400, is the high-profile one, asking whether Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 4(m) gives a district court the discretion to extend the time for service of process absent a showing of good cause. [read post]