Search for: "MATTER OF C S" Results 201 - 220 of 34,478
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
2 Aug 2011, 3:17 am
However, the courts have noted that police officer's conduct, as with any employee, that "is brought on by a matter wholly personal in nature, the source of which is not job-related ... cannot be said to fall within the scope of his employment. [read post]
24 Jan 2022, 1:48 pm by Yunlai Zha and Will Chen
Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) announced a Deferred Subject Matter Eligibility Response Pilot Program (the “DSMER Program”). [read post]
24 Jan 2022, 1:48 pm by Jing Zheng, Yunlai Zha and Will Chen
Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) announced a Deferred Subject Matter Eligibility Response Pilot Program (the “DSMER Program”). [read post]
15 Mar 2010, 3:08 pm by Bartolus
Definitely, do not stay, is the Court of Justice's answer. [read post]
22 Mar 2022, 4:12 am by Andrew Abramowitz
However, Rule 506(c), even though it’s within the rule that’s supposed to be for private offerings, expressly permits “general solicitation or general advertising” – so, public marketing of the offering. [read post]
4 May 2023, 6:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
" However, in this instance the Appellate Division, citing Matter of Casselman v Village of Lowville, 2 AD3d 1281, concluded that [Petitioner] established "... a direct causal relationship and thus demonstrated ... entitlement to benefits under General Municipal Law §207-c", Accordingly, the Appellate Division held that the Respondent's decision to deny Plaintiff's application for §207-c benefits was arbitrary… [read post]
4 May 2023, 6:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
" However, in this instance the Appellate Division, citing Matter of Casselman v Village of Lowville, 2 AD3d 1281, concluded that [Petitioner] established "... a direct causal relationship and thus demonstrated ... entitlement to benefits under General Municipal Law §207-c", Accordingly, the Appellate Division held that the Respondent's decision to deny Plaintiff's application for §207-c benefits was arbitrary… [read post]
9 Mar 2024, 12:24 am by admin
At the time of writing, Bill C-59 is currently at second reading in the House of Commons. [read post]
27 Mar 2023, 10:00 pm by Guest Author
”  Although these are not the only examples, similar subject matter qualifications are relatively rare. [read post]
23 Sep 2008, 9:03 pm
Mrs Bartsch challenged the refusal before the German courts which then referred the matter to the Court of Justice. [read post]
9 Apr 2014, 7:26 pm by John Gregory
The government of Canada has introduced a bill to amend PIPEDA on privacy matters. [read post]
15 Nov 2007, 8:11 pm
It's another Schedule C for the return. [read post]
13 Aug 2018, 4:30 am by Public Employment Law Press
Where the evidence is conflicting and there is room for a choice, a court may not weigh the evidence or reject the Hearing Officer's decision where his or her determination is supported by substantial evidence Citing Matter of Park v Kapica, 8 NY3d 302, the court opined that an employer's "initial award of Section 207-c benefits does not require the continuation of such benefits inasmuch as "[t]he continued receipt of Section 207-c… [read post]
18 Apr 2017, 9:01 pm by Michael C. Dorf
Nonetheless, the view that the Syrian airstrikes were lawful is a distinctly dissident one.Does It Matter? [read post]
11 Dec 2009, 3:59 am by Bartolus
In its judgment in Case C-425/08 Enviro Tech (Europe) Ltd v. [read post]