Search for: "MATTER OF D P K S"
Results 201 - 220
of 668
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
12 Jul 2018, 1:32 pm
The Appellate Division observed that in Brooke, the Court of Appeals overruled Matter of Alison D. v. [read post]
12 Jul 2018, 1:32 pm
The Appellate Division observed that in Brooke, the Court of Appeals overruled Matter of Alison D. v. [read post]
13 Mar 2012, 6:01 pm
S. had dealt with the cases of the Krohne company, but he then left [the law firm]. [read post]
18 Feb 2012, 2:31 pm
Put simply, exemptions are what property you are allowed to keep from creditors no matter what (except for rare circumstances). [read post]
28 Oct 2012, 2:33 am
(Robert’s Rules, 11th ed. p. 470.) [read post]
17 Apr 2007, 11:02 am
Kelly K. [read post]
13 Nov 2009, 2:52 pm
City of Golden, 113 P.3d 119, 130 (Colo. 2005)), aff’d, 176 P.3d 746 (Colo. 2008). [read post]
31 Oct 2015, 4:29 pm
Section 2 of the Representation Agreement Regulationdefines routing management of the adult’s financial affairs as follows:2 (1) For the purposes of section 7 (1) (b) of the Act, the following activities constitute "routine management of the adult's financial affairs":(a) paying the adult's bills;(b) receiving the adult's pension, income and other money;(c) depositing the adult's pension, income and other… [read post]
18 Apr 2016, 3:29 am
As intimated, the appellate court disagreed with Sam’s application of a minority discount a/k/a discount for lack of control (DLOC), finding it to be inconsistent with the statutory scheme’s purpose to protect minority shareholders and calling it a “windfall” for the purchasing majority shareholder. [read post]
18 Apr 2016, 3:29 am
As intimated, the appellate court disagreed with Sam’s application of a minority discount a/k/a discount for lack of control (DLOC), finding it to be inconsistent with the statutory scheme’s purpose to protect minority shareholders and calling it a “windfall” for the purchasing majority shareholder. [read post]
26 Nov 2008, 5:13 pm
State of Indiana (NFP) Thomas K. [read post]
23 May 2007, 8:16 am
k. [read post]
26 Nov 2014, 4:21 pm
Moreover, the Supreme Court’s judgment explicitly stated that the subject matter of the case was limited to an employment dispute and did not concern the applicant’s fundamental rights. [read post]
16 Nov 2015, 4:03 am
(In re Sheena K., supra; In re Walter P. [read post]
4 Jun 2014, 6:36 am
The new Prime Minister’s website also highlights transparency and accountability as the foundation of the NDA’s preferred method for governance for the next five years. [read post]
17 Jun 2010, 6:47 am
§ 203(k). [read post]
16 Mar 2015, 4:23 am
Box d. [read post]
13 Feb 2011, 3:01 pm
Figure 9 of the application shows examples of the graphical link representations, namely symbols “S” and “P” in links 126a and 120a, respectively.[5.3] The appellant has argued that an objective technical problem can be seen in improving the ease with which a user can construct such a simulation model, the claimed solution avoiding the “drilling down” required in the prior art to understand the relationships between the objects in the simulation… [read post]
26 Feb 2015, 5:00 am
National Drug Co., 23 A.2d 743 (Pa. 1942), long before the concept of §402A strict liability in tort was even a gleam in a plaintiff’s lawyer’s eye. [read post]
