Search for: "MATTER OF R T"
Results 201 - 220
of 53,756
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
21 Mar 2012, 10:23 am
DAILY CALLER: Media Matters Wants A Fight But Can’t Take A Punch. “After facing down more than a month of tough reporting, David Brock’s Media Matters for America still has nothing to say for itself. [read post]
23 Oct 2011, 5:01 pm
This common inventive concept within the meaning of Rule 13.1 PCT and A 82 EPC, respectively, also supports the unity of the application when claim 11 according to the main request is included.If one retraces (wird … nachvollzogen) the argumentation of the ED based on the problem solved such that the known feature “Disturbing the functionality of PMCA results in reducing the motility of sperm cells” is taken into account, one also comes to the conclusion that there is unity of… [read post]
21 Sep 2021, 4:45 pm
Ramsey (jdr@kjk.com), Janet R. [read post]
9 May 2008, 1:17 am
No matter how you feel about the Portland mayor's race, those who groove on R&B, blues, and jazz from the Rose City will want to take note of this campaign benefit for Mr. [read post]
16 Aug 2012, 8:16 am
T. [read post]
7 Oct 2017, 10:25 am
Steven R. [read post]
10 Aug 2011, 5:56 am
Some law departments set guidelines for how many timekeepers they will permit to charge time to their matters. [read post]
19 May 2009, 9:20 am
CHANGE: Democrats Won’t Fund Guantanamo Closing. [read post]
24 Sep 2013, 5:01 pm
It has argued that this amendment is a correction within the meaning of R 139. [read post]
6 Oct 2014, 3:48 pm
According to the report: [T]he workload demand increased from 1,896 new grievances in fiscal... [read post]
14 Oct 2013, 1:35 am
In the matter of “The Alexandros T” (Nos. 1, 2 and 3), heard 8 – 9 July 2013. [read post]
22 Sep 2023, 7:14 am
… [T]he form—the "where"—of Freborg's speech … further supports a conclusion that Freborg's posts were on a matter of public concern. [read post]
22 Mar 2012, 7:39 pm
And Maher doesn’t like it. . . . [read post]
17 Aug 2021, 6:15 am
What if IP doesn’t really matter? [read post]
27 Nov 2022, 8:32 am
Final thoughtsIn this latest decision therefore, the Board of Appeal expressly disagreed with the conclusions of T 1989/18 and T 1444/20 (and now T 2194/19), and agreed with T 1024/18 and T 2766/17 (r. 34). [read post]
9 May 2019, 11:49 am
Don’t forget to subscribe, rate, and comment. [read post]
3 Sep 2012, 5:01 pm
In respect of this subject-matter the question thus arises whether in the present case the test of R 28(d) should be applied per analogiam and/or whether the balancing test developed in decision T 19/90 and endorsed by decision T 315/03 should be applied under A 53(a). [read post]
3 May 2010, 3:01 pm
This “title of the invention” is also part of the abstract (R 47(1)). [read post]
20 Nov 2008, 3:00 pm
Don't miss this issue. [read post]
27 Oct 2013, 6:01 pm
There is an interesting final remark on the composition of the Examining Division (ED).[3] It is established jurisprudence of the Boards of Appeal that for a decision to be reasoned it must contain a logical sequence of arguments and that all facts, evidence and arguments essential to the decision must be discussed in detail (see for instance T 278/00 [2-4]; T 1997/08 [4]).[4] The Boards of Appeal have consistently decided further that a request for a decision based on the current… [read post]
