Search for: "MATTER OF RULES OF COMMISSION ON CH"
Results 201 - 220
of 250
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
14 Aug 2011, 10:23 am
The preamble to the Act declares the object sought to be achieved by the RTI Act thus: "An Act to provide for setting out the practical regime of right to information for citizens to secure access to information under the control of public authorities, in order to promote transparency and accountability in the working of every public authority, the constitution of a Central Information Commission and State Information Commissions and for matters connected… [read post]
26 Jun 2011, 9:48 am
Admittedly, there are statutory restrictions the Commission has to follow about when and what it can or cannot say when judicial disciplinary matters are involved. [read post]
23 May 2011, 12:36 pm
Ch. 1989), aff’d, 571 A.2d 1140 (Del. 1990). [read post]
28 Apr 2011, 10:40 pm
We now know that “in order to find the rules of the English law of breach of confidence we now have to look in the jurisprudence of articles 8 and 10” (Douglas v Hello! [read post]
25 Apr 2011, 5:18 pm
We now know that “in order to find the rules of the English law of breach of confidence we now have to look in the jurisprudence of articles 8 and 10” (Douglas v Hello! [read post]
29 Mar 2011, 1:56 pm
As a matter of international comity, it does not matter for this purpose whether the acts in question are unlawful under English law or under foreign law. [read post]
11 Mar 2011, 4:03 pm
She insisted afterwards that Timberlake removed more clothing than he should have done and that it was not her intention that it go as far as it did; but, in the face of public outrage, the Federal Communications Commission condemned it as a stunt, and the matter has even – briefly – reached the US Supreme Court (pdf). [read post]
8 Mar 2011, 3:46 am
Acts 1973, 63rd Leg., p. 883, ch. 399, § 1, eff. [read post]
8 Mar 2011, 2:18 am
Acts 1973, 63rd Leg., p. 883, ch. 399, § 1, eff. [read post]
20 Feb 2011, 9:44 pm
‘obviousness-type’ double patenting practise (America-Israel Patent Law) Injunction by ORT Israel against World ORT using name in Israel overturned (The IP Factor) United Kingdom An epic tale of… erm, patents and trademarks – EWHC (Pat) decides Datacard v Eagle (IPKat) (EPLAW) EWHC (Ch): Play-Doah ruling goes Hasbro’s way: Hasbro v Nahrmittel (Class 46) (IPKat) Hargreaves and the SME litigants (Solo Independent IP Practitioners) The patent… [read post]
11 Feb 2011, 2:00 am
Toal, 825 A. 2d 860 (Del: Ch. 2000). [read post]
26 Jan 2011, 5:00 am
Much of the challenge is over a statement by the Commission that management would not always resist an access challenge. [read post]
13 Jan 2011, 11:45 pm
CH Lighting International Corp. [read post]
21 Dec 2010, 7:36 am
Ch. [read post]
25 Nov 2010, 4:08 pm
The Codes of the media regulators – including Ofcom and the Press Complaints Commission – attempt non-exhaustive definitions of the public interest. [read post]
8 Aug 2010, 8:55 pm
” (Thanks, Rule 45. [read post]
19 Jul 2010, 12:25 am
(Class 46) Sweden Some culinary IP news… from Sweden (IPKat) Taiwan Taiwan and mainland sign IPR Protection Co-operation Agreement (China Law Blog) United Kingdom Trademark for IP TRANSLATOR refused by the UK IPO (IP Factor) (Non-) British brands (Class 46) EWHC (Ch): Added matter, intermediate generalisation and a good day for cricket: Fosroc International Ltd v WR Grace & Co. [read post]
17 Jul 2010, 4:42 am
Super. 108, (Ch. [read post]
24 Jun 2010, 3:15 pm
McCarty also admitted to failing to disclose that she and her husband received gifts, such as free and discounted stays at hotels, from parties who had matters before the commission. [read post]
21 May 2010, 3:19 am
Before I consider why in detail – and both because EU trade mark law is currently being reviewed by the Max Planck Institute at the request of the Commission and the Commission itself considers that the Court should reconsider its opinion in the instant very case (see [18] of Interflora v Marks & Spencers No. 2, [2010] EWHC 925 (Ch) [noted by the IPKat here] per Arnold J – I wish to say why I regret those answers.8. [read post]
