Search for: "MATTER OF RULES OF EVIDENCE"
Results 201 - 220
of 41,924
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
8 Nov 2023, 1:18 am
The Canada Evidence Act is an act of the Canadian Parliament created in 1893 that regulates how evidence is used in a court under the federal domain for criminal matters or civil matters where the federal government has jurisdiction. [read post]
17 Sep 2010, 5:55 am
Federal Rule of Evidence 606(b) provides that Upon an inquiry into the validity of a verdict or indictment, a juror may not testify as to any matter or statement occurring during the course of the jury's deliberations or to the... [read post]
10 Sep 2019, 12:15 pm
There are cases that seem to go both ways on this issue, and at first glance the rule appears to be something along the lines of “it is a violation, except when it isn’t, and also sometimes it doesn’t matter anyway. [read post]
5 Jan 2015, 3:58 pm
Contents May Have Shifted: Disentangling the Best Evidence Rule from the Rule Against Hearsay, 71 Wash. [read post]
18 Dec 2018, 12:04 pm
· The court observed that although a basic rule of contract construction is not to render terms of a contract superfluous, that rule doesn’t apply to synonyms–in this matter the court referred to various sources to interpret the definitions in this context of “terminate” and “cancel” to be essentially synonymous. [read post]
9 Sep 2008, 9:52 am
The site also has a companion blog, appropriately titled the Federal Evidence Blog, where they are highlighting recent cases and issues involving the Federal Rules of Evidence and other topical evidence matters. [read post]
22 Nov 2022, 6:31 am
Furthermore, in August 2021, NASDAQ accepted a “comply or explain” Board Diversity Rule. [read post]
22 Nov 2022, 6:31 am
Furthermore, in August 2021, NASDAQ accepted a “comply or explain” Board Diversity Rule. [read post]
14 Oct 2011, 7:16 am
Short answer: No, it does not matter at all in substance, although it evidently matters quite a lot optically.By the way, Grover Norquist, who is no fool when it comes to assessing optics, understands this, and has apparently criticized 9-9-9 for permitting taxes to look lower because they appear to come in separate bundles. [read post]
9 Jan 2023, 4:54 am
The post May a Judge Rule on a Motion to Suppress Evidence Seized Under a Search Warrant That He or She Issued? [read post]
11 Feb 2022, 1:24 pm
The Court ruled that Crown counsel had a duty to provide the defence with all the evidence that could possibly be relevant to the criminal case. [read post]
30 May 2011, 6:10 am
Similar to Federal Rule of Evidence 404(b), Alaska Rule of Evidence 404(b)(1) provides that Evidence of other crimes, wrongs, or acts is not admissible if the sole purpose for offering the evidence is to prove the character of a person... [read post]
16 Jan 2012, 4:00 am
In the end, the court found no evidence of diligence on the part of plaintiff and denied the motion. [read post]
12 Sep 2010, 5:11 am
Like its federal counterpart, North Carolina Rule of Evidence 901(a) provides that The requirement of authentication or identification as a condition precedent to admissibility is satisfied by evidence sufficient to support a finding that the matter in question is what... [read post]
12 Sep 2010, 5:11 am
Like its federal counterpart, North Carolina Rule of Evidence 901(a) provides that The requirement of authentication or identification as a condition precedent to admissibility is satisfied by evidence sufficient to support a finding that the matter in question is what... [read post]
4 Apr 2010, 5:09 am
Federal Rule of Evidence 803(5) provides an exception to the rule against hearsay for A memorandum or record concerning a matter about which a witness once had knowledge but now has insufficient recollection to enable the witness to testify fully... [read post]
24 Jul 2012, 3:25 pm
Similar to its federal counterpart, Utah Rule of Evidence 803(5) provides an exception to the rule against hearsay for A record that: (A) is on a matter the witness once knew about but now cannot recall well enough to testify... [read post]
2 Apr 2011, 5:42 am
Federal Rule of Evidence 803(5) provides an exception to the rule against hearsay for A memorandum or record concerning a matter about which a witness once had knowledge but now has insufficient recollection to enable the witness to testify fully... [read post]
24 Dec 2011, 8:12 am
Federal Rule of Evidence 803(8) provides an exception to the rule against hearsay for A record or statement of a public office if: (A) it sets out: (i) the office’s activities; (ii) a matter observed while under a legal duty... [read post]
3 Oct 2013, 9:52 am
Federal Rule of Evidence 803(7) provides an exception to the rule against hearsay for Evidence that a matter is not included in a record described in paragraph (6) [the business records exception] if: (A) the evidence is admitted to prove... [read post]
